mark

Researchers also measured land-tenure security: in Tawahka society, kinship ties are a more important indicator of this than are legal property rights, so researchers measured it by a household's duration of residence in its village.
假设就是land security-> kinship-> duration

原文信息是use of chemical herbicides

But these studies have focused on villages with limited land that are tied to a market economy rather than on the relatively isolated, self-sufficient communities with ample land characteristic of rain-forest regions

错选c，same rate不对，太绝对了，只要增长就可以，不用same rate

with表原因时，看介词后跟的核心名次，with不能表示一串逻辑关系，只能给出一个逻辑主因（名词），类似于beacuse of，可以是with the developement of internet connection，但不能是with the developing connection

expect的约束力较强，后面最好跟to do

with无法表达因果关系，a主要错在is的时态上

what作名词解，判断What从句充当比较对象之一是否正确，我们需要判断what指代的对象有没有把比较的范围扩大化。比如在此题中，由于what professionals are paid的内容可以包括除薪酬以外的其他报酬，所以 what把比较对象扩大了，故不正确。

分号连接两个句子，E选项分号后面不加 and 可以嘛

on condition that意思是“在...情况下”，通常表示一种虚拟的情况

而choice b, public employment, relief, and social security在定语从句中作为宾语

public employment, relief, and social security were in large measure what they had been responsible for
in large measure的意思是“在很大程度上”。在逻辑上，不是社会安全等在很多程度上负责，而是这两个女性在很大程度上负责社会安全。因此，必须用two women做were in large measure的主语。

Geologists therefore wondered whether the friction between the plates was being reduced by pockets of pressurized water within the fault that push the plates away from each other

错选a啊，rather than没有被摘录，摘录的是女作者不支持的那部分意识含义

原题目如果去掉never的话是不是可以省成c选项

同是状语，用 “when” 引导和 “，having” 引导表达意思不同。A：被开过低剂量的药【之后】他们没有接受充分的治疗； D： 被开过低剂量的药【时】他们没有接受充分的治疗

请问毕出老师，C选项可以理解成despite后面接了一个宾语从句吗？

文章比较简单的话，题目的坑就比较多

看到small theft and inconsequential vandalism应该要意识到相对的是什么，是serious crime