倍数的比较:x times as many as B; x times more than B; x times B
B/D，there are fewer than 100 Arabian leopards left in the wild, making them many times more rare than panda，伴随状语跟随主句主语，主语是there are，错误
关于E中逻辑关系的梳理：
3件事情：(1)偷猎和栖息地减少，(2)猎豹少于100只，(3)比大熊猫还少
E句1作状语修饰2，3与2平行，表示1导致2，2与3之间没有逻辑关系。
2、3之间是否有因果逻辑关系可以参考另一道考题：
Right: more littering has occurred because of the lax enforcement of laws against littering. 垃圾增加因为管扔垃圾的法律执行不严，因果关系
Wrong: more littering has occurred because people have been throwing bottles along the side of the road。人们在路边扔瓶子和垃圾越来越多是一件事情,而不是因果关系。
同理，猎豹数量不到100只和猎豹数量比大熊猫少是一件事情，不用because或伴随状语表示英国关系。E逻辑正确。
过去完成时：
1、表示过去的过去。要使用过去完成时，要求句子里有一个一般过去式动词，或者一个过去的时间词语发生在过去完成时的动作之后。
eg.:
(1)The film had started by the time we arrived at the theater.
film had started在先，然后We arrived
(2)By 1945, the United States had been at war for several years.
1945是过去的时间，had been at war发生在1945年之前
2、过去完成时不强制要求动作本身的持续。
eg.:
The teacher thought that Jimmy had cheated on the exam.
He had cheated在先，然后teacher though he had cheated。
3、只要表达清晰，事件发生的顺序无歧义，过去的过去的动作也可以用一般过去时。如有before、after说明事件的先后顺序，不必用过去完成时had done来描述事件发生顺序。
eg.: Laura locked the deadbolt before she left for work.
语意题：
do sth for sb，为某人做某事
A for 修饰reduce，政策削减了成本for这帮人，ok
B for修饰reduce，成本被政策削减for这帮人，ok；但by要么+doing，要么+纯名词，不接action noun，by one''s cost cuts用法错误，应该是reduce costs by cutting……，
C The government's prediction is 语意不够通顺，应该是government predicts that，另外by cuts用法错误
D for修饰reduce，ok，但句子的主干是政府的预测削减了成本，错误，不是预测削减了成本，是政策削减了成本
E for修饰predict，政府预测某事for这帮人，错误
While alive, a stem sends hormones>> suppress formation of further stems.
But when the stem dies, its hormone signal also ceases>> resulting hormonal imbalance triggers a huge increase in new,
所以火可以抑制 hormonal imbalance ，避免過多成長
扫描二维码，直接登录
那么费劲，错选e
e之所以错，最直接的一眼看出来的是possible 和 approximate重复了，可能 大约的。。正常也不会这么说。。
in fact possibly serving as an approximate thermometer.
in fact 和移动possibly 也是重复了