the investors's speculation that... === the investors speculate that ...
一开始不能理解为何speculation后面是宾语从句，难道不是定语从句（后面的句子修饰speculation）？

第一段This strategy, however, has actually 【hindered companies' competitiveness】. For example, 【cost shifting】 【threatens】 employees' health because many do not seek preventive screening.

定语从句是一个倒装句，正确顺序是both the northern and the southern Indian alphabets derive from the script.
判断倒装的一个方法，把which还原成script，就变成了from script，就可以知道定语从句的主语并不是scriptle

我觉得是不是我的逻辑链没提取对，题目最后一句话说给定income会从harvest wood中来，公司可以获利。我以为E选项是排除他因。也纠结过D选项，但是以为只加强了结论没有作用于逻辑链。

They rejected preservational bias because a total absence of breakage in two extinct species demonstrated that the fractures were not the result of abrasion within the pits.
.>>如果had NOT found that two extinct carnivore species were free of tooth breakage ，那麼fractures were the result of abrasion within the pits.
＝Ａ： breakage frequencies could have been the result of damage to the fossil remains in the La Brea pits

B项： 应该是Was，而不是were. over the past xx years需要用完成时

surprisingly stable,

conventional car普通车

错选D，发现有个解释的很到位
This suggests that the independent suppliers are in a position to offer these services at a lower cost. But during the bidding process, there is no certainty that the lowest bid will ACTUALLY be lower than the cost incurred by Vernon. It may just be the lowest of all the bids, but not necessarily lower than Vernon's own cost.

"一些欧美的制造商近期提高了他们的加工能力" 不就是说明求会变大吗？，然后价格不就上升了吗？

题目：有几个人声称看到狮子+没有人会撒谎——狮子存在。c否定了没有人会撒谎

Darfir's manufacturing sector is now operating at near-peak levels.生产能力已经达到极限，再刺激也没用了。
把几年前的情景和现在的情景dui比，B提出了不同之处，weaken

E也不能说明吧，人完全可以是迁徙过来的啊，不能靠人就说明村庄的归属吧。。。

E.g:
Right: The bones of MA, a meat-eating dinosaur, were found in Africa.
Wrong: The bones of a meat-eating dinosaur, MA, were found in Africa.
第一句指MA用一种食肉动物，ok
第二句表示食肉动物是MA这种动物，错误

CD的区别在于是这种海洋白帽对全球变暖的影响是海洋环境的一个方面，还是海洋白帽影响了全球变暖这件事是海洋环境的一个方面？
应该是生物对环境的影响是环境的一个方面，而不是生物影响了环境这件事是环境的一个方面

by是介词，后面+名词
affected by whether Taiwan develops a closer relationship with mainland China or preserves the status quo，这里whether A or B是从属连词+从句作名词，表某件事，作事实主语
又如：whether or not he will come is uncertain里whether+从句作主语；He considered whether he should do it.，whether+从句作宾语
从属连词+从句作主语或宾语是语法里非常常见的，需要关注的是（1）从属连词连接的是句子而不是分词（2）从属连词要在从句里充当成分

evidence to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal，如果没有这个证据，那么我们不会知道（suggest）大象起源于水生动物，所以用to表示evidence和显示大象起源于水生动物这件事之间的逻辑关系（evidence带来了后者状态的改变）
同理，There is no evidence to suggest which approach offers superior returns to the investors.如果有证据，则哪种方式能为投资者带来高回报是会被suggest出来的，二者的逻辑关系也是evidence存在与否会带来后者状态的改变，用to，不用that从句和分词引导的定语从句

have the capability of，拥有某项才能，如拥有捕食的能力，拥有赢的能力

凡是有主语有宾语的句子，后面带了比较的，都需要注意主语和宾语两个名词的存在所可能引起的究竟在跟主语还是宾语比较的歧义
如SVO, like sth，到底是S like sth还是VO like V sth，错，改成S， like sth，VO
SVO than sth，错，改成SVO than sth V
SVO rather than/instead of sth,错，改成SVO rather than/instead of sth V

like经常放句首，放句子中间是否可以要看是否会引起歧义。 比如，S， like sth, V O是可以的。 但是S V O, like sth就不行了，容易造成歧义了，因为不知道like是就近修饰前边句子的宾语还是后边句子的主语