走错地方了。。。

those who still harbored ＝those (who were) still harboring

omg 我第二次做看成cost of cutting and restructuring！！！！！！，想骂死自己

at the cost of 应该修饰这个提议，不是这个城市付出了代价

ABDE都无法加强，只有C提到了陪伴，擦边。

With+名词+现在/过去分词，是独立主格。With+名词+that不是独立主格，不能做状语修饰一个句子
E.g: **With an awareness that the price in mall is too high, consumer chooses to shop online.
A do sth with B,A和B一起做某事。会让人误以为consumer choose to shop online with an wareness.

not inherent in the classical humanist tradition 和 the classical conception of leadership was incompatible with同义替换

gear，齿轮；gear sth to sth，使某物匹配某物，使适合；to是介词，接名词或ing

E，会暗示是Siberia's Lake Baikal itself is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined, with more than 300 rivers draining into it作状语，修饰holds我觉得也行，300条河汇入，储水量占全世界的20%，两件事有逻辑关系的。

来自谁的支持用of更合适，by是通过什么

that只能代指newspaper或者circulation，根据语意明显不代指newspaper，如果选D，than后面就是circulation in the six months ... in a similar period a year later，句子就不对了。

1.银行每月扣除服务费如果这月内任何时候帐户里的钱少于100. 上个月她被扣除服务费没有?
1) 上月她取了1000. 2)上月除她有500在帐户里.
因为没有任何条件告诉上月存的钱和每天的钱是否少于100, 所以E.

odd+even=odd
odd+odd=even
even+even=even

一年365天，365/7=52余数为1，所以每过一年，星期向后推一天，1984年向后推两天。

A，Siberia's Lake Baikal holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.
相当于后面省略了more than all the North American Great Lakes combined (hold)，正确

D， Siberia's Lake Baikal holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water, which is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined.
=20 percent of the world's fresh water is more than all the North American Great Lakes combined
将水和湖比较，错误！应该是将水和湖持有的水量比较，
补足以后的句子应该是：20 percent of the world's fresh water is more than which all the North American Great Lakes combined hold
然而因为前面的比较句并没有这个结构，所以无法作以上补足，比较对象错误！

平行是 H. Ross Perot's independent run

Dismissive：轻视的；Indifferent：漠不关心的；Vindictive：报复性的；Cautious：谨慎的；Ambivalent：模棱两可的。

1. "In fact" and "possibly" are contradictory. "In fact" implies "definitely true" - something cannot be "definitely" and "possibly" true at the same time. Therefore E is wrong.

2. Moreover, even if the phrase "in fact" is ignored, the meaning implied by E would be that the number of chirps per minute possibly serves as an approximate thermometer already, not that it CAN be served as an approximate thermometer.