错选e,
discuss two authors' works这里的author指的不是文章作者,而是文中提到的两个work作者。。。。理解错了。。。。
错选c which accurate data about women's participation are difficult to obtain
不是没看到data,而是没有感觉更对的
下次用排除法, data肯定不对,不能选,e可能对或者泛泛一些但是仍然可选
lower只能做形容词,不能修饰动词rose;
high/low 不能修饰动作,只能修饰名词。more/less才可以修饰动作,也可以修饰名词。
in this sentence, “little" functions as a noun. you can use "much" in the same way: there is much that is different...
(C) 正确, a substance that…独立主格结构作为thromboxane的同位语对thromboxane进行解释说明; but does跳过同位语和suffices并列共同作为a low dose of aspirin的谓语动词
【meaning】
the problem with (a) is that it says only that companies are aware "that there ARE connotations". but the companies don't necessarily know what those connotations are.
//
i am aware that discounts are available this weekend.
--> i know that there ARE discounts, but i don't necessarily know the specifics.
i am aware of the discounts available this weekend.
--> i actually know the specifics (percentages or whatever) of the discounts.
错得够白痴!
NOR = NOT OR
供应商养殖鱼类的生长速度和鱼类自然生产速度作比较.不是与供应商自然养殖鱼类速度比较
没读懂文章,重做一遍
理解错题意了the author considers problematic?
就是关于removing的部分,author觉得problematic
exemplify例证
within different habitats 注意仔细阅读问题
Moreover, whereas P. ochraceus occupies an unambiguous keystone role on wave-exposed rocky headlands, in more wave-sheltered habitats the impact of P. ochraceus predation is weak or nonexistent, and at certain sites sand burial is responsible for eliminating mussels.
状语,就近修饰动作的原则!!!
A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one
没有仔细读所有选项导致误选c
An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities仔细读文章,c错误,constant
直觉
They do not clearly constitute evidence of general environmental degradation. 对
第二段最后一句Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.
They have probably been caused by a combination of chance events. 错 ,作者没这么说
earlist 时间相关
Though the extreme rapidity of quantum tunneling was noted as early as 1932, not until 1955 was it hypothesized—by Wigner and Eisenbud—that tunneling particles sometimes travel faster than light.
只有这句话涉及时间,1932年认为not travel faster than light.
问题是reach no maximum, 认真审题!
no evidence, basis = grounds
大行星存留的趋势,重力吸引,以及逃离速率,escape,是为了解释大行星继续存留的tendency, 虽然不是直接释义,但是是为了解释他。
a中没有提到region这一项
frame of reference 参照系