并列连词and使得“夺取牡蛎的味道（rob the oysters there of their flavor）”和“改变盐水成分（alter the saline content of Apalachicola Bay）”之间具有对等并列的关系。但在逻辑上，显然改变盐水成分是起因，夺取牡蛎味道是结果，因此两者不是并列而是因果关系。

A 同位语 rules (intened...)
B to be assigned / to be put through triage 约束力不强
C 独立主格 ’put through triage‘ literary 应该modify patients NOT emergency room
D with the intent of 介词短语
E this is 不能指代内容 意思上doesn't make sense

E还是有些绕口，尤其是：those to impact the most on people

in the name of progress 是修饰语，that have跟的应该是前面两个名词。

C的错误在于后半句。第二句并不是质疑这个assumption，第二句质疑的是由这个assumption所推导出来的“many companies charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product”这个结论。

The phrase “festival’s month” is not idiomatic. It gives the meaning that the festival possesses the month. When referring to an inanimate object, we must avoid possessive. This expression should be “the month of the festival”.

少用了多少时间

relative judgements:
B：that were orbited VS orbited
D：that are about VS about
C: discovered that there were VS discovered

relative judgements:
CD：there was/had been homes with... VS homes had...

relative judgements:
D：requiring that devices be on nets VS requiring devices on nets 省略之美

relative judgements:
D：responses that are unconscious VS unconscious responses

relative judgements:
D：agree on as a... VS agree(that) is

同时C的burning of fossil fuels 没有human beings burn fossil fuels好，但选项中无。再次说明了相对性错误不能作为eliminate的原则。

relative judgements:
D：having been based on VS based on

relative judgements:
A:there are provisions of the code ... that provide (redundancy) VS the code provides

dedicate是主动语态，E的话应该说are dedicating 或者直接用dedicate

relative judgements:
A： M’s conception of the radio was... VS M conceived of the radio as...

relative judgements:
DE：with approval not needed/with no approval needed VS needing no approval
E：before the raising of VS before raising

relative judgements:
C：expectations are for VS are expected to be
D：it is the expectation that VS It is expected that VS are expected to be

relative judgements:
AC：having been
D： repetition of “explain”

relative judgements:
ABC:(that were/having been) cut VS cut