commission a review采纳一个review
capability to do;GMAT认为capability of X-ing/in X-ing是wordy/awkward的。
C错,应该是as other reptiles can
C相当于drug is intended for use by both adults and children
错选E,因为看到原句有must,以为must是必要元素_(:з」∠)_就直接选了
however, "this" as an ADJECTIVE (the way in which it is used here, in front of the noun "vantage point") is just fine, and is quite exceedingly common.
法官本身没有问题
削弱题 法官的专断导致了方案无法顺利实施
C选项,”how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to“是宾语从句,从句的核心词是动词collide, 而实际上rate的对象自然不会是collide.
选项E解释牛逼
choice D
However, scientists have failed to devise an experiment to demonstrate both behaviors simultaneously.
sporadic 零星的,分散的
思路
undetermined 不确定的
看第二段的解释1 样本不具有代表性 2 之后的会引用之前的 因此达到削弱的作用
this strategy would be advantageous because fewer animals would be necessary to maintain the genetic diversity of tigers in captivity, making scarce zoo resources available for housing other endangered felines.
white tigers are merely Indian tigers—a subspecies well represented in both zoos and the wild—and that zoos should focus their tiger management efforts on preserving subspecies whose existence is threatened
imply推断题一定要小心 有陷阱 理解透!!
这段文章其实一共提出三个观点,前两个是引述,后面一个是文章观点。前两个观点都承认family hunting territories是private landownership,区别在于前者认为欧洲人到来前,A人并未拥有这一private landownership,是和欧洲人的皮草贸易来带的社会变异以及生态环境等因素促成了A人拥有private landownership,后者认为欧洲人来之前,A人已经拥有private landownership。
第三个观点即文章观点:A人的确已经有了family hunting territories,但不属于private landownership。A人的family hunting territories是以几家合成的更大的community为单位,在精神上和社会上互利互惠,这和欧洲人语境下的private property完全不同,因此前两个观点把family hunting territories称作private landownership是错误的