演绎吧 为上面的conclusion找个理论基础

premise和conclusion的差距在于randomly和regularly 坑

C选项的with改变了原句的逻辑关系，应该是并列关系而不是主从关系。

D选项do应该指代action verbs，不能代替be动词are。 B选项语法正确，但是太概括了，boy经历了很多不能表明就是stress..
原文的more likely比较的是概率的大小，than后面只能加are；如果原文改成are likely to result more in depression，那么than后面可以加do/would/can等。

明明就是个果因推理。。。

我觉得这道题是因果，真正的重点在文段后半部分：新方案实施后，overdraw收费30 + 目前超过10%的人overdraw，所以收入超过3块/人（因1）；又因为成本是3块/account（因2）；所以可以推出结论：新方案能盈利（果）
D选项的意思是，新方案实施后，人们没有minimum-balance requirement了，会有更多的人overdraw，即收入会变更多，所以加强了因果。

C选项：their不能指代athletes，名词所有格不是名词; 提高准备nonsense
E的them不ambiguous，要想指代performance,要用themselves

请问为什么不是第三人称单数

J, S, V could be located in opposite direction.

n=3,4,5
(1) n could be 3 or 5 if it is the factor of 15
(2) n could only be 3 if it is the factor of 21

第一问 宗老板说：正过来是5/30 (中间交叉的）

第三问，宗老板说：用ad dollar per reader/2006 CPM

D says that some severance packages require workers to stay at the company until the last scheduled day they're supposed to work (say, next Friday) or they don't get their severance (which may get paid that day or at some point in the future - we don't know). E says that some severance packages require workers to stay until the day that they are scheduled to get their money - in other words, they stay until, say, next Friday which is the day that they are actually paid.

Such a location requires that blood circulated to the tail of the snake travel a greater distance back to the heart, a problem solved by another adaptation.

第一段最后一句就点明了中心啦 专门说陆地的蛇

在语法中不存在excepting for。只有except，except for，和excepting

错选A。最后一段作者提出新的观点如modern educator，说明不是summarize
作者最后一段举了insistence on classifying the problems和realize ambitious projects，证明support态度。

对照试验组嘛。T这里自身就有时间这个变量了，那么mainland必须不变

结论没看清

在10年以后的条件下A项其实没有意义，因为题目既没有表示30岁变49岁以后就不读书了，也没有说这两部分人口比例有啥变化，就是还是保持原状呗。所以相当于A是句废话，私以为题目把10年改一下，改成100年之类更好