AB中的it非常的ambiguous
(C) When Henry VIII's ship Mary Rose, which sank in 1545, was recovered in 1982, archaeologists found more than 17,000 artifacts on board,
and, if a partner and i are going over the terms of a contract and we reach a mutually acceptable compromise, then we agree ON that compromise (and, in this case, "agree with" and "agree to" are wrong).
if i have the same opinion as person X does, then i agree WITH person X (and, in this situation, "agree on" and "agree to" are wrong).
the example given in the book is "X is a means to Y", which means that X is some action that can be used in an attempt to attain condition Y.
if you're still having trouble seeing the ambiguity here, consider the following:
possible interpretation #2:
C:Ron
"Due to" does modify nouns, but it's typically used after the verb "to be."
再说说关于C选的一点想法。倒推一下,如果C是对的,过去的补位商场和倒闭商场是同一种商业模式,说明啥呢?说明商业模式不是导致商场倒闭的原因,也就是说,不应该是折扣店抢了非折扣店的生意,应该是非折扣店自己玩脱了。而我们要证明的是,就是因为折扣店抢了商业街的生意从而导致商业街无法翻身了。
tend to do sth.
"if [participle]" -- a modifier that, by convention, refers to the SUBJECT of the sentence (not the proximate noun).
一定一定要找到作者真正最想让平行的两个内容
it只是形式主语
介词短语只能跟介词短语平行。A中who was a jazz pianist and composer是非限定性定语从句,其会让人读者认为Thelonious Monk仅在过去(was)是爵士乐钢琴家和作曲家。但在逻辑上,显然Thelonious Monk其实一直是钢琴家和作曲家,即,应该用同位语a jazz pianist and composer而不该用定语从句。
条件给出b、c都是大于零的数!
四种字母的:第一个字母有26中可能性,第二、第三、第四同理,乘法法则,所以为26^4
第一小题supermarket D不就是反例嘛?人均年龄35.1在35和40之间,可是less than 10 items的人数是5,大于平均3.5
看两边共10有几次方,然后刨去24X10,剩下的10的n次方变成100的m次方即可
做题的时候在BC里纠结了一下,其实B错的还是很明显的把and之后的部分对应到前面发现没有主语可以连接 jacket's stinger并不能can use it...
至于DE:Ron:
"Whereas" already implies that you're drawing a contrast between two different situations. So, "whereas" + "in comparison" = redundant.