演绎推理。只可意会不可言传

前提： tend to live longer ⬅︎regular volunteer work
releases endorphins ⬅︎ volunteer work

结论： extend people's lives⬅︎ releases endorphins
问题中的hypothesis证明此题为果因结构，他因削弱还是同音异果／异因同果？讨论选项与文章结论：安多芬的释放一定会延长生命‘之间的因果关系

make it seem 中的it作为形式主语

后面的话是researcher的

手段：requiring all tulu plants to be tested for fungal rot before being sold.
目的：reassure worried gardeners
而30周前test不出来，解决这个问题，就是30周之前不准卖，这样所有的都能得到准确的检测

B是双重否定，说high labor rates和公司减少labor cost是否一致。原文说： one company could pay its workers considerably more than another and yet have lower labor costs。那也就是说High labor rates = pay workers more咯？看来是没明白labor rates这个词这里就错了。

其实作者在第一段就表明了对这个观点是misperception的看法了，没敢选是因为我老觉得他需要有一句明确说“这是错的”的话。下次长记性了

favor理解为选择的意思。 simply修饰are，翻译为仅仅。如果没有are，not ..but 就不平行。

我感觉B和E的区别是，E是一定对，B是suspect，如果没有E这样的一定对的选项，B也未尝不可选

没看出来平行，源于不知道direct用法。难受,direct：=control,manage and govern

威慑呢么错，毫无缘由

不明白，overcompensating 和 growing extra 这是一个意思啊为啥后者不能修饰前面的呢？

which says的which指代的是oil industry
exacerbate 使···恶化

190/800

How many people 【in the group】 are in favor of a flat tax?
支持T和支持R的人里面都有favor of a flat tax的，问的是这个group 支持 flat tax的 总！数！
Of the people in the group who support 【Candidate R】, 58 percent are in favor of a flat tax.
Of the people in the group who support 【Candidate T】, 22 are in favor of a flat tax.
还是要看仔细啊....

until recently zoologists believed 问的是zoologist之前的看法

One critic's response to the philosopher's new work is not【 that the position it takes is heretical, as some have asserted, 】but rather 【that it is nothing new to anyone who knows anything about the topic.】

在E中a novelist不是elma Lagerlöf 的同位语么，可是同位语不应该是紧挨着的么

million是六个零.. 两个逗号....

D中injured为什么不能是插入语