这道细节推理题出得很tricky,我觉得我和很多同学一样会在最后徘徊于A和C之间。
回原文定位,就是段2第一句长句。初看这些细节貌似很多process,和现代企业很相似,但其实这些是列举early chartered trading co的capability,而不是transaction的复杂性。通过分析early chartered trading co在应对综合商业活动的能力后,作者得出了文末的观点。
换句话说,选项C很有迷惑成分。
total no for selecting 3 out of 10=10c3=120
no. of ways in which no two married people included= tot- 2 married couple included
2 married couple can be included in 5c1,no. of ways selecting a couple, * 8c1, no. of ways selecting the third person,=5 * 8=40
so that 结果
in that 原因
如果选A:the army of terra-cotta warriors took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete them
them 和 the army of terra-cotta warriors 重复了
找到有对比的地方 一般这样出题
ABC, 0
A,BC
B,AC
C,AB
两个房间顺序对调所以再X2=8
3C3
题目没读仔细,还在算MAR-OCT每个月的增量,实际这几个就是卖NOV- FEB的存货
Nov-Feb: Total Prod: 4x
Mar-Oct: Stock: 3.5x, 3x...0.5x,, 0 是a1=0 a8=3.5公差为0.5的等差数列。 求和S=(0+3.5)*/2=14.
所以14x*0.1=1.4x
看错了题目,要解释的是为啥poll is accurate~
D The largest source of atmospheric pollutants in Torinia is not automobile emissions, but emissions from power plants.
【最大的】污染源不是汽车尾气
不管汽车尾气是不是最大的,只要它是污染源,更换老旧的汽车减少尾气排放就能一定程度地【减少】污染,无法削弱
D选项 like in,like后是不是不能加介词短语呢???
like+noun 是用于表示比较的结构
and 可以连接两个不一样的时态,参见OG宇宙大爆炸那题
这里原句没有表达出,link和show有一前一后的顺序,从语义上推测也无法推测者二者需要一前一后发生
所以在时态上这二者需要平行
在origin sentence没有出现逻辑错误的情况下,需要遵循origin sentence的逻辑
错选A。还是应该在做题前观察选项呀,我只关注到一个split点就是主语问题,其实句末也有代词的split
请问老师动词的约束力怎么看呢?
同问
我感觉约束力这种东西太玄了,好多感觉是知道答案之后硬套进去的
这是我迄今为止见到的唯一一道宾语从句不加that的题,如果有其他这样的题希望有人回复我。
Ron对这道题表示:
is this problem really from GMATPrep?
it doesn't look like an official problem. you would want "that" here, as noted above. also, "it would be closing" would be better than "it was closing", since this was a future event at the time of the announcement.
看了你的回复我决定直接pass
有个题里面说的是it is said +句子,后面也没加That
这个真题...真是稳稳当当的prep题==
E 只有当 考察的考点是就近修饰的时候 才完全按照就近修饰 否则可以跳跃修饰
并不是
RON:here's the basic summary:
if you have "X of Y, which..."
then:
* if Y works as the antecedent of "which", then "which" should stand for Y.
* if Y doesn't work as the antecedent, but "X of Y" DOES work, then "which" can stand for "X of Y".
搬运的解释,所以别多想,which依然不能修饰句子
介词+名词+Ving 结构要特别注意,RON说没见过对的。
说完整。。是介词+N+Ving作限定性修饰语没见过对的。这种结构在独立主格中很常见。
我服了,太久不做SC真的是手生啊。我在玩蛇蛇
细节题,找准原文定位,不要按照自己已经有的知识想当然,是作者的意思不是你的意思。
A manufacturer's fixed costs and "sunk costs" (original capital investment in the physical plant) do not decrease when production declines due to inadequate supplies of raw materials, problems on the factory floor, or inefficient sales networks