v-ing 的逻辑主语也与前一句保持一致的

to do 表目的 很清晰
v-ing表示同时发生也很清晰

B overlook只当忽视讲，不是轻视

that为什么能越过individual，指代reactions啊？除了A of B可以跳跃指代A，其他介词也可以吗？比如A in B， A for B，A on B？

第一眼就感觉应该用to do来表示目的清晰明了 但是忽略了后面的平行

Though the law will require emissions testing of all diesel vehicles, from tractor trailers to excursion buses, it will have no effect on sport utility vehicles, almost all of which are gasoline powered and therefore not subject to emissions-control standards as stringent as those for diesel-powered vehicles.
①注意 这个 并列式放在which从句里的
②subject v adj 做动词时 subject sth to sth 做形容词时 be subject to sth /sb

只有顾客才能有耐心，网络不能有耐心。

”which will 就远修饰a board of high pressure, 因为谓语builds很短。不然句子就要变成：while a borad area of high pressure, which will bring fair and dry weather for several days, builds.了， 头重脚轻。 ----by IrisH ”

https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/the-first-trenches-t7576.html

怎么觉得(is represented in virtually every kind of habitat) 的主语是Graveteiro鸟呢， 如果a group of 是主语的话， 后面and就是平行tag了，后面B选项里面and后面就应该是 and that is represented in vitually.....

until 连词 句子
until 介词 具体时间

1. but后添加also是有问题的。also的意思是“也”，它是一个语气助词，通常表示和前句“同方向”的事物再次
2. safely是副词，应该就近修饰动词handle，即，应改为：
households were confident in their ability to safely handle new debt.

published只能做修饰语，若非如此，就必须用被动形式，因为书籍自己不能主动“出版”

【文章给出的因】社交多→智力好【文章给出的果】
【正确选项给出的因】药物导致智力受损→社交受影响【正确选项给出的果】
因果倒置，符合因果方向问题

since后的文字，总是支持结论的，而一段文字可能有多个结论，这种情况，一般是两种结论相互矛盾，作者支持的为main conclusion

这篇文章的conclusion其实是these facts do not warrant the conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious

老师给的解释里，说“第二个黑体字是推理文段的主结论，也是对第一个黑体字这个现象的一种解释。“
可OG里说”the second is not the argument‘s conclusion“，怎么回事？

A中的dispute不是争议讨论吗？为什么翻译成质疑？

C项"rate how likely" vs. "rate the likelihood that..."后者更加合理一些；此外，will be to 不合理
E项，likelihood和may重复

选对了...但是第二遍看得时候觉得C貌似也对...去搜了一下Ron的解释...依然看得云里雾里...