看到B的时候有点迟疑,没有马上选它。后来用排除法,排除了其他的,就只有B了。
A. australopithecines were frugivores (fruit eaters)
C. the tooth microwear characteristics of east African australopithecines specimens are indistinguishable from those of chimpanzees and orangutans,
D. region not mentioned.
E. not lacked. the tooth microwear characteristics of east African australopithecines specimens are indistinguishable from those of chimpanzees and orangutans,
He also disputes Szalay's suggestion that the heavy enamel of australopithecine teeth is an adaption to bone crunching...
What percent of the projected attendance was the actual attendance? 这不是再问预计是实际的%吗,所以我认为题错了。
同问,不应该是1.25/0.8吗?
critically 是严苛地意思
Thus, Santer disputes Michaels's claim that model predictions and observed date differ fundamentally.
It ( sulfate cooling) drastically slowed warming in the Northern Hemisphere, and warming in the Southern Hemisphere raced ahead. Since 1987, Santer argues, the greenhouse effect has reasserted itself, and the north has taken the lead.
1987 = late 1980s.
In the early 1990s, Pat Michaels sought to explain this disparity, suggesting that sulfate emissions in industrial areas had a cooling effect, thus temporarily retarding global warming.
temporarily = in short term
请问D 新的项目会大大减少老年人严重摔倒的可能性 意思不也是说可以省掉以后的医药费用 只是现在多花钱 但是以后就不用再花钱么?为什么D这个选项不对呢?
C和D犹豫了很久选错了……
结论:因为 therapeutic program的费用12500超过了正常摔倒的治疗成本11000,所以这个program不好。因此要从cost上入手,D的话,推理文段也没有说emergency treatment就一定会导致overmedication,就算会overmedication而导致老人又摔倒,那我也还是宁愿花少的钱治疗,也不用 更贵的therapeutic program
有道理 感觉自己脑补过度了 谢谢回复~
同 at least
应多加小心
从未考虑本身连词的逻辑错误
72 of the teachers 不是72%。。。。
at least
plan里面包括两点 一个是扩大生产 一个是继续维持广告
答案取非,可以推出过度控制:
B 被控制的物质都会对环境造成破坏-------有些被控制的物质不会对环境造成破坏-------过度控制(可以推出)
D 所有将被控制的污染物目前正流入北海--------有一些不会流入北海--------对这些污染物的控制仍然是必要的,不能推出过度控制
求问E选项为什么不能理解成requiring和spending是impose 的伴随状语
B,BUT连接两个句子或者功能相同的成分,此例是定语从句
D,conceive约束力较弱,用as+n做状语,因为名词表示一种客观的恒定的,事件不存在变化,不定式表示的是一种“主观性”,即,表达一种状态的转换(start-stop)ing表示的是一种“客观性”,即,表达一种状态的稳定(process)。且关系词which就近修饰的主语不对。
E,other than不是连词=except,表示除了……以外,是介词短语。可以改为rather than
mark
there is no reason to suspect that the effect would be qualitatively different than what was seen in the aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption
insect eating, which can cause distinct micro-wear patterns, would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons, who eat only soft-bodied insects rather than hard-bodied insects.
这个题想了一会儿,选了D,排除法。但是仔细想想,原文就只有一句话提到了baboons,来例证W的观点不对。这句话要好好读,理解: insect eating would not cause much tooth abrasion in modern baboons. 句子的修饰中提到了soft-bodied 和 hard -bodied insects,那么就是D了。