看成加强了........

又错了.........

show that

c: 骨髓中存在t不能说明是骨髓癌。
因为骨髓中cell本来就不断分裂(continually divide)。

”which will 就远修饰a board of high pressure, 因为谓语builds很短。不然句子就要变成：while a borad area of high pressure, which will bring fair and dry weather for several days, builds.了， 头重脚轻。 ----by IrisH ”
我觉得这个解释非常讲得通，之前就接触过 名词非就近修饰的问题， 当谓语动词比较短的时候， 定于从句可以跳跃修饰，比如说：
a new CEO has been hired who….
希望这个答案对大家有帮助。学习gmat坚信了太久which不能指代一个句子，不愿意被这样奇奇怪怪不负责任的解释推翻。

最后结论 是说由座位改变 引起的利润增加 从这里想啊

linger 逗留 单词

B选项说成功公司已经开始这样投放广告了，但并不能说明这种广告策略是成功的，成功不一定是因为广告。
D选项其实是提出了另外一个方案，和本方案的定制型邮件策略无关

看到一个and 就以为是复数 ........ 看清楚主语..........

they, their, it都是完整指代，即指代包含了被指对象的所有修饰成分， that， one都是核心指代。

A： they denounce while supporting.

为什么总是错这么弱智的题呢。 alcohol is taken rather than consumed. taken 和 consumed平行

固定搭配,,.......> 想当然选了with

A:the cause is not so much A as B
E: it is not so much the cause as that

1措辞 especially 尤其，有比较的意味；specially 特别的， 没有这个意味
2 不定式和V-ing的区别
3 because & because of 的区别

句子中想表现对比关系，那么as要引导句子。

宾语是bwtween and..短语

我终于想明白了，因为对于每一个过去一年都是准的，那么对于5个过去一年的估计加在一起，即可知道那五年准确的gdp，则可以发现agency对于那五年的预期是不准的

D: Being born in Calcutta in 1940...
E: Having been born in Calcutta in 1940...
In these options, the words in red can be omitted without any loss of meaning, as illustrated by the OA:
Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988.
In the OA, the intended sequence -- that Bharati was born in Calcutta in 1940 BEFORE she became a US citizen in 1988 -- is crystal clear.
Since the words in red are not needed, eliminate D and E.

a选项，being 作为 v-ing开头的opening modifier 表示发生在与主句动作has lived 同一个时间点上 错误
b选项，having modifier表示 这个动作发生在主句动作之前，先成为美国公民再出生 逻辑意思错误