A选项：文章提到resort hotel为商业资产；
B选项：前提是'undisturbed forests and wetlands'
C选项：文中提到可以创造就业和创收；
D选项：that all ecosystems have economic value-indeed, that all ecological services are economic services
E选项：不是由natural asset提供的，要是天然的才是ecological service
C compares the total fat of these two kinds of animals rather than comparing the animals themselves.
D is comparing total fat with livestock.
B is the best of the bad boys.
A and E are out because, we don’t have a proper reference for the pronoun they.
B looks apparently better than others, because, in gist, it maintains the comparison between wild animals and domestic animals, although it is also meaning to say that wild animals have less total fat than they have livestock, which is indeed absurd
本文遗漏一句话，现修正：But this concern, in the absence of an economic argument for conservation，has not translated into significant conservational progress. Some critics blame this...
For lower-priced restaurants, where one expects less assiduous service, Tucciand Talaga found that a guarantee could actually have a negative effect: apotential customer might think that a restaurant offering a guarantee is worried about its service.
A选项：第一段末尾：For skilled activities such as electrical work, where, consequently, a guarantee might have greater customer appeal.所以A❌
B选项：“ if one expects less assiduous service, Tucciand Talaga found that a guarantee could actually have a negative effect"，应该是less appealing, 所以B❌
C选项：‘since customers understand a restaurant's product and know what to anticipate in terms of service, they are empowered to question its quality.’ 所以是less appealing. ✅
D选项：吸引顾客
E选项：低价餐厅
A选项：The passage does not question the results of a study; rather, the passage appears to accept the results
B选项：优缺点
C选项：does not indicate the conventional wisdom.
D选项：For restaurants generally, the main benefit ....
E选项： impact on the service provided by a restaurant，说的是sevice-quality guarantees对饭店提供服务的影响，但文章前半部分说的都是service-quality guarantees对customer的影响。
扫描二维码，直接登录
c