论述开采油砂矿所需承担的风险最终也是为了解释油砂矿在油价长期高位时才具有开采价值,且文章首尾都提到“油砂矿长期高位才有开采价值”,中间部分解释此现象的原因——开采油砂矿需要承担的风险。C更像是目的,D更像是内容。不知道这种解读的逻辑错在哪里?求助。
我想如果选c的话 那就无法解释为什么会讲述伊拉克的例子
选了D,题干因:airing of a controversial report on the economy;证据:received a very large number of complaints regarding the report;果:experienced a drop in viewership。
D中,该组织发表争议性报道不止一次了,如果前面的若干次争议性报道都带来了a drop in viewership的结果,那该组织应该不会再继续争议性报道了吧,所以说前面的若干次争议性报道没有带来a dropo in viewership 的结果,能够起到削弱因果的作用吧
前面几次的情况是自己脑补出来的,况且就算有前面的情况,以前也不能推出这次情况如何。
Yes, option B is right. Both of them agreed that after the revolution, women has increased opportunities for education. Their opinions differed in the effect of revolution, which means they didn't agree to the extent of support for women education before revolution.
after 1750 in the option A? Is it correct? the report was published in 1753
Why is not D?
请问这道题有讲解吗
定位句为New regulations have imposed extensive compliance costs on companies still using older industrial coal-fired burners that generate high sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide outputs
错选a,定位应该在第二段的开头
代入法最快
第一次选择为 1/2(四个里面任意选一个白色的), 第二次选择为2/3(剩下3个里面选择红色的),第三次选择为 1/2 (两个里面选则红色的),第四次选择为1。所以就是 1/2 *2/3* 1/2 *1=1/6
16/64=25%,要审题啊
e. 反了。 傻了……
第一次选择为1/3,第二次选择为2/3,第三次选择为1,所以 1/3*2/3*1= 2/9
为什么吧不能(30+60)/2呢?
这里一共有三个人!
Idiom; Agreement
The sentence uses an idiom that is correctly expressed as think of x as y. The use of
to be is incorrect.
A To be is incorrect in the idiom to think of x as y.
B Being is incorrect in the idiom to think of x as y.
C Being is incorrect in the idiom to think of x as y. Their does not agree with
a consumer.
D Correct. This sentence uses the idiom correctly: think of household
products as.
E The passive-voice construction is awkward and wordy.
A. No administration can really be said to control - Correct
B. No administration can be said that it really controls
- "said that" changes the meaning of the sentence
- "it" redundant
- "controls" not parallel with non-underlined "manage" (based on non-underlined word, government here is treated as plural)
C. That no administration can really be said to control
- Usage of "that"
A. No administration can really be said to control - Correct
B. No administration can be said that it really controls
- "said that" changes the meaning of the sentence
- "it" redundant
- "controls" not parallel with non-underlined "manage" (based on non-underlined word, government here is treated as plural)
C. That no administration can really be said to control
- Usage of "that"
D学生自带不自带和学校卖不卖无关