high quality -- high prices
special quality advantages are hard to obtain -- cannot sell at high prices -- a smaller market advantage
?paradox
data是复数
结论不应该是:16,000 到24,000之前山洞中的的水比今天的雨水中含有更少的deuterium吗?
另外,我觉得这题并不是类比推理,而是一个普通的现象解释题,已知一个发现结果,来问产生这个结果的原因,逻辑关系上更像因果关系。
因为结论重复了前提 所以是类比推理 因果的前提和结论是两件不同的事情
我比你轻,不是我的weight, **grams 比你的weight轻(light)
and so 因此 可做连词
“The children behaved badly and so the teacher kept them after school. ”
前面可以不加逗号
mark 老师的解释:
很多同学可能会认为“伴随”也可以表示因果啊,为什么这里不可以呢?实际上,伴随所表达的因果是一种自然而然的因果,例如:
Jack kicked the post, feeling pain.
“感觉疼痛”是“杰克踢杆子”的自然而然的结果,所以“感觉疼痛”用了伴随状语来表达。但在本选项中,“实际上可以做温度计”显然不是“叫声随着温度而变化”的自然而然的结果,因此不能用伴随状语来表达。
resulting from 不是状语
因果链 削弱其中一个就行
It's a tricky one.A不好,但是其他更差.
A: 早撒毒米,早吃完,但存在吃不完影响后面的可能性;
B:incapable of producing 亦是threaten species.
C:Native birds 不吃不能减轻 threaten for migratory birds. 无关处理
D:无关
E:not detectable 让migratory birds更容易吃 wrong
BB1(cc complete) reveal P 降 T升 --> T升导致了P降 --> argument: BB2(cc wrong)
BB=black bold
CC=cencuses report
P=population
T=tax
context=背景、上下文
BB1= CONTEXT / ASSUMPTION, B,Dwrong
A: to argue against the position the historian seeks to establish. wrong,
E: an assumption that the historian explicitly makes in arguing for a certain position; not explicitly, the assumption serves as context for evidence.
三刷还是错 怎么想都觉得是因果推理T T
bond face错误
表白毕老师!!
但是line39-42有提到sedimentary evidence can be dated with sufficient accuracy by radiometric methods to establish a precise chronology of the ice ages..
就是因为这里,我在d和e之间犹豫了半天,还选了d.....
大半夜做这道题,花了五分钟。脑子转不动。因果关系,找加强的assumption。取非一下更好懂
选项有点绕,取非一下就好懂很多。给自己mark一下。
我有一个问题,E中 which caused only a mild illness, cowpox只引起轻微疾病不是既定的事实吗?这句不是应该用一般现在时嘛?
in q24 choice c, the comparison is between ANIMALS and THAT (which in this case stands for FAT). you can't consider livestock to be the second half of the comparison, because it's part of a prepositional phrase (which is a modifier and therefore can't be part of the comparison).
主句使用的是现在完成时,所以从句也需要使用现在完成时。
错啦