It is an idiomatic usage that when we use a verb after 'as well as', we always use and verb+ing form. Emitting is a gerund here because as well as is preposition rather than conjunction in this context and a preposition is always followed by a noun of an action noun 'gerund'. A question of parallelism arises only when a coordinate conjunction is involved and not with a prepositional phrase.
so, i can't think of a situation in which "having __ed" (without a comma) makes much sense, since that would imply that "having __ed" is a temporary state. hm.
so, here's the thing: once you have done something... well, that's true forever.
as well as' is not strictly a parallel marker.
"known as" is incorrect unless it is followed by a noun:
The newly freed workers, seeking to become self-employed tenant farmers rather than wage laborers, made direct arrangements with merchants for supplies.
总之,ABCD从人数看,看不出来到底有没有联系新人;从钱数看,只有BC在说钱,B加强,C说的是人均 也看不出来到底努不努力
A.大部分联系了但没捐款的是老人
前提:作者假设:只有联系老人,才能有高成功率
补充 c.只是加强前提/fact:老人更容易捐款
A.as frequently as 和exceptional对应
果因推理:
不用果因的结构想:这里真的好难说清楚前提和结论哦……
Canvas帆布
1.support+will not result in=削弱
A 不对是因为和原文最后一句话“his may be at least in part because the greater the awareness customers retain about the cost of an item, the more likely they are to use it.“ 重复吗?
04:00~开始
答案B错选D 支持楼上keepfit的分析
要注意D这样的陷阱 D只是重复说了一遍原文第一句 不能算作假设条件
if you say "different from X, Y...", then this means that X and Y themselves are different.if you say "unlike X, Y does Z", this means that Y does Z, but X doesn't do Z.