句子结构：As is the case with…, prescriptions are… 比较结构。
考点：比较
1) 比较的习惯用法，as be the case (with)…，是prep新出现的固定搭配，是as the case be的倒装表达，常见的错误用法有：as it be; than be the case; as in/with the case of等。
(A) as it is with…搭配错误，it无指代，不能指代后面这个句子。
(B) as with the case搭配错误。
(C) 正确，as be the case with…连接比较对象。
(D) 应该是as A do, so B do结构，缺少do。
(E) like连接比较对象不对等，pharmacies和cornerstone。

A是对的，第二个boldface讲的就是第一个所说strategy的drawback -- 虽然描述是the use of a title can facilitate... 反写句子就变成not use the title can not facilitate... ，确实是drawback. B选项错误，因为第二个boldface没有就第一个boldface达成其目标-促进内部的沟通的有效性进行批判

老师，这个题目的出发点，到底是从你语音讲解的成分出发呢？还是从文字解释中的比较级出发？

如果从语音中的成分出发：
A选项中，but连接了前后2个定语，都修饰a diet，而且并列连词but并没有要求前后的成分，语法和形式上完全平行啊，所以of 和
that定语从句并列为什么错了呢？

如果从比较级出发：
这个题目应该比较的是diet呢？还是diet里面所含的卡路里呢？还是能等同于“吃”这个行为？不同的内容，比较的形式不同啊，感觉看这个选项的比较级要晕了。
针对于D选项，就算可以等同于“吃”这个行为，那么than的左边没有平行对称的结构啊“they would normally eat”,than的左边，就算补全了也是they are fed a diet that ......

我看过你写的那本语法书的比较级方法了，但是到实际做题，不会那么死的，灵活度太大了，感觉比较级的题目一直错下去啊。。。

老师，B选项，that引导的非限制性定语从句修饰milky sap，但是that不能引导非限制性定语从句，所以做题时是这么判断的。麻烦老师帮助解析一下！

老师，这个题目的意思是说“海商法有这么一个规定”，应该是“这件事”最终刺激了争端。那么D选项的this为什么不能理解为：前面的“这个事”，或者说“这个情况”刺激了。我记得上课说过，类似于B选项这种it，它不能指代“这件事”。

for machinery is just scrap unless it is organized functionally and supported by appropriate systems of operation and maintenance.

A选项的定位在：The constructivists gain acceptance by misrepresenting（constructivists对于technological determinism的理解） technological determinism: technological determinists are supposed to believe, for example, that machinery imposes appropriate forms of order on society. The alternative to constructivism, in other words, is to view technology as existing outside society, capable of directly influencing skills and work organization.

B实际上是constructivists自己的观点：Technological change is constructed as the outcome of negotiations among interested parties who seek to incorporate their own interests into the design and configuration of the machinery. This position represents the new mainstream called social constructivism.

All progress in industrial technology grows out of a continuing negotiation between technological possibility and human need.工业技术的所有进步都是在技术可能性和人类需求之间不断谈判的结果。

再回到B选项上来，比较容易错误地将它排除的原因就在于on the influence of managers。但我们发现在第二段有一句：Clark believes this possibility has been obscured by the recent sociological fashion, exemplified by Braverman’s analysis, that emphasizes the way machinery reflects social choices. For Braverman, the shape of a technological system is subordinate to the manager’s desire to wrest control of the labor process from the workers. 将以上两句意思进行概括正好就是B选项。

Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists by both theoretical and empirical arguments.

At the empirical level Clark shows how a change at the telephone exchange from maintenance-intensive electromechanical switches to semielectronic switching systems altered work tasks, skills, training opportunities, administration, and organization of workers.

B 非限制性定语从句，表明一些鱼类，所有这些鱼类的卵孵化需要数月，
C 限制性定语从句，将一些鱼类分成了两类，即：“卵孵化需要数月的鱼”和“卵孵化不需要数月的鱼“两类
根据语意，即然句子要表达的是与silvery minnow这种鱼卵的情况来比较，那么就不可能用可以分成两种情况的鱼来比较，故限制性定语修饰错误，应用非限制性定语，B正确。

A选项both...and...是习惯表达；B选项both...and...引导的平行结构不平行，且hoping没有平行对象，不能和插入语里面的成分平行；C选项having won错误，在分词短语里在having表示先时性，但是won这个动作不可能发生在Perform前面；E选项having错误同C，both...as well as错误同A

This historian assumes that Alessandra had goals and interests different from those of her sons, yet much of the historian's own research reveals that Alessandra acted primarily as a champion of her sons' interests, taking their goals as her own. Thus Alessandra conforms more closely to the anthropologist's notion that personal motivation is embedded in a social context.

c的解释说XXX均不影响感染病菌的幼虫数量的减少而引起的总数量的减少。
但是题目的结论不是so the number of ticks acquiring the bacterium would likely decline——所以总数量会减少嘛。。。

请问老师with结构如何解释进行排除呢？

电脑最多买到尹书记的3倍，假设尹书记买b个，电脑最多买3b个，电脑1500一个，尹书记300一个，现在一共有9100元，问电脑最买几个？（不是一共华妃9100元的定值，别理解错。。。）
1500*3b+300*b=9100

一小时=60*60=3600s

原来用两个逗号隔开的形似插入语的定语从句是算成非限制性定语从句的呀，我一直以为是个插入语，然后插入语可以把两个逗号去掉，所以就可以从that来引导定语从句了，看来之前一直想错了。只有三者平行，或者两个完整句子间的and才能加逗号，不能有目的的在主语和谓语间加逗号，插入语除外