C 省略主谓
Herl在之前的某道题中说过:“相关因果其实也是果因的一种。按果因看,没毛病。”
wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain and (have) more of a kind of thought to be good for cardiac health.
请问老师,如何区分 相关因果推理 和 普通的 因果推理。 二者cq不太一样。对做题影响很大
viewership 和 viewer没区别吗?
( Conestoga wagons had high wheels and a floor that was curved upward at both ends to prevent )
https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-254588-1-1.html
D E high than或者as.........as
要被og上D选项的解释笑死了,你怎么知道hurt是过去时,raise是现在时,出题人给你托梦了是么???
这个they are为什么一定要表达出来呢 既然后面likely to exceed都能省略 为什么they are要硬生生的写出来
D it is likely that可以
怎么清空时间二刷题目呢?
directly修饰歧义-have 或者with an ichana (dream) experience 应修饰contact
C the last三者以上
that they (should)not be named
A and后面没有谓语动词
A there are和that多余 they指代code错误
A rated about 20/500修饰vision legally blind修饰baby 在if it were an adult中it修饰baby
citrus是单数
more fuel-efficient small cars有歧义 more可以修饰efficient或者cars