这个they are为什么一定要表达出来呢 既然后面likely to exceed都能省略 为什么they are要硬生生的写出来

为什么选项c的play的主语不是family而是molecules

A：去掉强调结构“it is……that……”并还原成正常语序后为“the fixed costs makes……”主谓不一致。

E选项，因为Electra是属于八本中的一本，不具有第一类那十本的特性，所以可以推断出Electra是没有评论也没有出现在other medieval manuscripts中的，进而推断出Electra在任何一本medieval manuscript中都没有评论，即E选项。
C选项的时间范围是in ancient times，E选项的范围是in any extant medieval manuscript，C比E范围大了，所以错误。

请老师修改一下，这道题的黑体字标错了，第一个黑体字应该标注到第一个whiplash为止，不包含后面那句“spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified”。

"letting employees pick (the benefits) most important to them" is giving us more information about what happens when "companies are offering a wider range of benefits."

这个第二个条件说不通吧，怎么会既拿loan又拿奖金是50%，可是说拿loan和说拿奖金的是30%、40%。。。。最后neither的反而是80%？？？？

这个如果第二个条件改成y=-4x-3，那么第二个还sufficient嘛？我的理解也是sufficient，因为回答了问题：No, it is not positive. 还是说问题一定是求出斜率必须positive？

这个不是选c吗 slope=-4/3 ?

7乘以C2/10=7乘以10！除以（2！乘以8！）

审题要仔细，最后问题是问占所有学生的fraction，而不是问占second year学生的fraction

RON的回答：i think this sentence makes sense with either "would have to" or "have to". there's a slight rhetorical difference ("would have to" carries the connotation that these forecasts are just hypothetical and don't actually have to be developed, or that at least it's not important, while "have to" implies that these forecasts are important and have to be made),

but you don't have to make such rhetorical distinctions on the exam.in this case, you don't have to, since both choices involving "have to" (without "would") are wrong for other reasons.

E：a treatise 作Discourse同位语

* estelle was afraid to move because of a spider sitting on the wall --> correct, because estelle is afraid because of the spider itself, not because of the spider's sitting on the wall.

* we laughed all day because of tony walking into the girls' bathroom --> incorrect, because the verb (walking into the bathroom) is the reason why we were laughing all day.

前提：
大部分人都把简单的任务留给自己，难得留给他人
（大部分人）认为这样做【对自己】是公平的，他人说大部分人是不公平
结论：
（大多数人）【对自己】比【对他人】有更加低的道德要求
分析:
（大多数）人认为【对自己】是公平，（大多数人）认为【对他人】是啥呢？——没说，gap选a

1、题目中有 the author mention as support
2、原文：Although no one has quantified changes in the rate of straying as a result of the disturbances caused by humans, there is no reason to suspect that the effect would be qualitatively different than what was seen in the aftermath of the Mount Saint Helens eruption.

又他妈考单词

我写了完整的公式，竟然后半部分被吞了。。。算了，还是不留言了