rivaling证明主语必须是terra-cotta

b错在哪儿了 无法理解。。。。

这是一道改变原句意思的题，主要是将原句不太符合逻辑的顺序改为符合逻辑的句子。做题时注意分辨。

modifiers that start with the relative pronouns “who”, “which”, “that” must actually be CLAUSES. in other words, the modifier must actually contain a VERB whose subject is who/which/that.
this doesn't happen in choice (c); there is no verb present in the modifier.
d后是独立主格

第一排20座，第二排21座，第二排以后每排增2座，an=a1+（n-1）d，a1=21，n=16，d=2，an=51，sn=（a1+an）n／2，s16=576，所以一共s16+20个座=596

2000年的stock是9000-6000=3000，2003年是10000-5000=5000，所以2003年比2000年多了5000-3000=2000

从高到低15排到1，从低到高1排到20，一共34个

这道题是linke the gap
colleague --> doing important research.
scientist wins renown --> not a true colleague
链接gap:
Not a true colleague --> not doing important research. 答案D
原文讲的是true colleague和doing important research之间的关系，和是不是科学家没有关系啊。E属于无关选项。

RON：the core of the sentence is
a bird has colors.

both 'found in the philippines'** and 'resembling a hummingbird' are modifiers. they use somewhat different specific verb forms—but they both modify the same thing, and so they're parallel

enable和to be able是一个意思

provide complelling support for doing/ to do

for doing,表示已经存在的事情
to do,表示目前不存在的事情。

“状语从句the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants中的比较对象是没有任何问题的。这是一个省略现象，补全则有：
the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as the cost for other types of power plants.”

The link between the success of a certain well-known Japanese automaker and its effective management of its suppliers, for example, has led to an unques- tioning belief within Western management circles in the value of strategic partnerships.

句子中for example，可以理解为用一个具体例子来展示某一商业措施的价值。

D的in adults 位于 each language后面，是language的修饰成分。

自己想了半天，觉得those of 好诡异，最后选了A，结果比较耗时太久直接忽略了raised这个过去式！然后看解释又纠结了好久。。。最后看到大家说ABC的比较都对才停止纠结。。。果然还是raised的问题

travelling修饰前面的句子，表伴随（个人理解为补充解释）

发现他们的规律 1 + (-1) + 3 + (-3) + 5 + (-5) + ..... ，所以两个都是充分

appear to 看起来好像

这道题怎么做哦

they错，句子主语是mutual fund。