不太明白~~从本地受益怎么就是前提了呢?不受益就不会lower fitness吗?
一道充分反映GMAC出题思路的SC题
selling是对前面的解释吧然后后面的with又是对selling的解释?
读题不仔细
读题不仔细
读题不仔细
D.can :able to do
【RON对于E的解释】
- the simple present tense join implies that there is some sort of timeless truth about the statement being made. that's the wrong meaning: the sentence is meant to say that the rich nations have begun to do this as a result of current trends.
'for maintaining competitiveness' is bad idiomatic usage: it's an incorrect way to express intent or purpose.
exhibit 表现出
我想这题应该要靠前面说过labor cost 和labor rate不一样, cost的高低会被很多因素影响,比如生产率,员工的talent等等因素,所以衡量比较labor rate更方便,不用评估其他的因素
appreciative; appreciable 词义
好吧time是时代。。
定位在The very techniques these historians used to uncover mass political behavior in the nineteenth century United States - quantitative analyses of election returns, for example--were useless in analyzing the political activities of women, who were denied the vote until 1920.
前面出现了athletes representing the United States in the Olympics。所以e完美了。.。。
确定them是运动员,那么e里面这个运动员是所有格形式,不是不可以用代词吗?god why?
gmat里的that不是不能单独指代吗?
不受益就不会本地的基因就不会被稀释,本地基因不会被稀释就不会gene flow,就不会lower fitness,是这样吗?