aware 这里是adj, 这个形容词结构修饰companies
形容词+宾语放在句首跟ing+宾语放在句子前的结构是一样的,因为是省略了being,而且一定要省略的 worried about和curious about都可以这么用的
B中的they指代不清楚,优先指代之前出现过的,但逻辑上是指代后面出现的companies
aware 这里是adj, 这个形容词结构在这个句子中是什么成分
i am aware that discounts are available this weekend.
--> i know that there ARE discounts, but i don't necessarily know the specifics.
i am aware of the discounts available this weekend.
--> i actually know the specifics (percentages or whatever) of the discounts.
the problem with (a) is that it says only that companies are aware "that there are connotations". in other words, literally, the companies just know that there are connotations -- in other words, that connotations (of some sort) exist -- but the companies don't necessarily know what those connotations are.
many schools do not have, or likely to have,应该是很多学校没有,或可能有
(B) nor作为连词,do not have, nor likely to have不平行, 应该在nor后面加上are, 使are likely to…和do not have构成动词结构的并列或者将likely to去掉,构成do not have, nor have的平列
请问them在这里指代新项目 还是 新项目和老项目呢?记得老师说代词只能指代一个名词
老师我想问a选项than 后面加has oil是什么用法
同问,A项为什么不是than oil has. than前后不是应该平行吗?
是省略,还原回来是:natural gas has still accounted for far less of the energy consumed in the United States than oil has accounted for the energy.
+1
than oil has和than has oil是一样的,没有区别,只是一个倒装了
D
problem #1
a substance to promote... is unidiomatic.
the only context in which i can remember "a NOUN to VERB" is a context in which the NOUN is abstract in nature. for instance:
a way to produce goods
a reason to try harder
etc.
note that "substance" is a concrete item; it's not an abstraction like "way" or "reason".
谢谢搬运!
赞
注意虚拟语气,和only的位置
B选项 the money be controlled by local school districts, but it allows them to spend the money only;此处前半句省略了should,补出之后应该是 the money (should)be controlled by local school districts;后半句是but 连接两个句子,单独看的话应该是 the administration's demand that it allows them to spend the money only;此处 it 指代 demand ;them 指代 local school districts;意思是要求允许地方学校把钱花在...其实此处不用过分纠结代词,因为老师说过代词只要能指代句子中语义合理的词就是对的;
棒(๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧
考点:1-虚拟语气,should可省略; 2-allow的主语不仅只能是人;
赞
题目里有个however没有看到。本来是把这个fee放在第一次购买的时候交的,题目里的方案是把它放在salvage的时候交。
我实在是不理解这个选题方式需要断掉前提和结论间的因果关系是什么意思,我停留在这句话上很久很久
B that修饰Convention,错;应该修饰draft
C 过去完成时 错
可是主结论只有“it is likely he finally will”,后面的since一长句话都是给出的原因呐,不能把它也归于结论吧?
A →成本高也可能商用
所选取的样本并不具有代表性?是这样吗
chose A, then feel that actually A is nothing to do with the time of 1165 and 1167, therefore it's nothing to do with the conclusion.
只有D满足平行
A也错在不平行
经济下行导致美元贬值,有一个前提是赤子的发生,d说赤子发生之前,经济下行导致美元贬值了,直接攻击题目reasoning的premise,所以虚弱了题目的conclusion
前后时态不一致,一个是过去的影响一个是现在的,如果你后面像E一样就默认了时态和前面是一致的