错选了 c,c是文章的目的。。。问题问的是f of p这本书是如何在文章中被描述的,定位如下:In Forces of Production, David Noble examines the transformation of the machine-tool industry as the industry moved from reliance on skilled artisans to automation. Noble writes from a Marxist perspective, and his central argument is that management, in its decisions to automate, conspired against labor: the power that the skilled machinists wielded in the industry was intolerable to management. 故d
"they" is totally wrong in (d). it would automatically refer to "neurons", since "canaries' " is possessive and therefore ineligible to be the referent.
similarly, (c) has incorrect pronouns (the first "they" would automatically be "brains", and the second would automatically be "neurons").
(b) has ambiguous pronouns.
if you say "when + PAST PARTICIPLE", then this automatically applies to the SUBJECT of the clause to which it's attached.
if i say
iron accumulates rust when submerged in water
then it's the iron, not the rust, that's submerged in water.
this strikes choice (d), since the SUBJECT is "recently documented examples", not "mice" as required.
And the other thing wrong with A, B, C and D is "when placed in a stimulating environment" - it sounds like they are referring only to the time that the mice are in the stimulating environment - but the brain growth is permanent. It doesn't shrink back down once the mice are no longer in the stimulating environment. Ditto for the increase in neurons in the canaries.
Tough one. "examples of neurogenesis include" - so the examples should lead off with whatever the actual thing is that indicated neurogenesis. The mice aren't the example - the example is the brain growth. That eliminates B and C. A also breaks parallelism.
E选项的错误应该同D吧?
due to 放在句首可不可以直接排掉呢?
只能animal exhibit preference, 不能list exhibit preference
求解,知道年龄和分辨导致他灭绝的原因有什么关系
不同的灭绝原因使得它们达到生殖成熟的年龄不同
嗯嗯,清楚了,谢谢
scheduled 应该修饰day而不是修饰package,改变原句意思
put up with: If you put up with something, you tolerate or accept it
A. destroy和damage并列不合逻辑
B. 正确,房子在过去的地震中被毁了,所以用过去完成式
C. 时态不对/and连接destroy和damage不对
D. have been时态错误
E. last year放句首,有歧义,会理解成去年buildings have been constructed
AB which 只能指代名词,不能指代句子
D 句意矛盾: 一个成就被尝试在11世纪初。没有了to repeat. 如果真是成就,那么就应该是成功的/一个(被尝试的)成就没有成功;后半句主语不正确;
E but without success = but other Scandinavian kings attempted to repeat later without success
C中 already stimulating其实看作伴随状语胡的话,虽然通常修饰最近的,但要修是句子主语,所以already stimulating修饰islets,而这样是错的?这样想对吗?
我一直认为原文是在讨论下卵的数量问题,跟size没什么关系啊,第一句确实说了suitable size,但是后面都没有说size的事情啊。但是又好像只有a可以从原文里推断出,其他的好像都需要脑补
c,they 指代是fertilizer,但是这里语义是肥料的使用导致了环境问题,而不是肥料本身导致了环境问题
In the 1920's, the automobile industry dominated the American economy, with one out of every eight workers employed in an automobile-related job.这里employed不会出现修饰不清吗?到底是修饰eight workers 还是 one?到底是八个人中有一人是被汽车相关的工作雇佣还是八个被汽车相关的工作雇佣的人中的一个??
但是这里c的where可以指代societies吗?Manhattan里说抽象名词不可以用where指代啊,where只能指代具体place啊
A选项对比的是rate?如果对比的是rate,那就应该是the rate is 25% lower than the rate would be for birds, 比较对象是主语,为什么后面的rate可以用it代替?不是应该用that吗?
我也有这个疑惑。
我现在知道了:虽然这里的两个rate不一样,但是没有加定语,所以it就指代rate,用完全指代没有歧义。
(B) that只能指代rhino population,从而跟后面的their estimated population意思重复
(C) the population’s estimated amount表达笨拙,复杂
(D) 表达复杂,笨拙;their没有指代对象。
(E) 表达复杂,笨拙,that指代rhino population和their population’s estimated amount意思重复;their没有指代对象
从句子意思考虑,原文给出了具体数字,我们可以看出CDE都有问题,是9 times more 而非10 times more
表示倍数是可以直接用倍数(数字+times)的,就像double后面是可以直接加名词的。