学习古典乐的音乐家少了=有才华的音乐家去学习古典乐少了=古典乐表演的质量下降了=没有人能欣赏到古典乐的美了=人们抛弃古典乐转而喜欢别的流派的音乐了。conclusion：为了让古典乐一息尚存，必须（must）鼓励更多的年轻人去学习古典乐。解释：有没有发现conclusion中有一个must，只有鼓励更多年轻人才能让古典乐流行起来。问削弱：不仅仅只有这一个办法，还有其他方法让人们去欣赏古典乐曲。或者说，人们欣赏到的古典乐的质量其实没有下降，人们依然可以欣赏到优美的古典乐，这样就不会导致没有人能够欣赏古典乐的没，导致没有人抛弃古典乐了。

没有注意结论的short term

我选了B，我看很多名词都是，但是我却没注意到B把两个东西放在一起比较。

考点：代词／平行／
in the early 1980s, at the time when／the early 1980s, during the time in which这两个表达是对的吗？有没有赘余的问题呢？

nonetheless一个副词连接2个动词没有错吗？

Two numbers differ by 2 and sum to S
两个数字和是S差是2

?

好吧 只是没听过except in。。。

D选项 by which 的 which 充当什么成分呢？老师能否解释下这个定语从句？

P: DTL 能吃的食物population增多了
C: DTL 就会少吃带有病毒的wfm了

最多4个77：1个77时，350-77=273，273/7=39，则1+39=40；2个77时，350-77*2=196，196/7=28，则2+28=30……

to all employees, and require employees who are out of shape to participate....这就很扎心了

a比较的是时间状语，意思是小车［现在比过去更节能］，而句子想表达的意思是［现在制造的小车］比［过去制造的小车］更节能。比较的应该是宾语而不是时间状语。

C(10,5)-C(6,5)
五本中肯定要含B的（因为A只有4本），所以只需要考虑5本中不含A的情况

C 不能理解为方案不可行
不能因为员工曾经知法犯法，就默认情况不会改善。

Economic development, particularly industrialization and urbanizatin, contributes to the growth of participatory democracy.

文章讨论 not industriliazation and not urbanization, but canon or more exactly linguistic backgrounds and strong leftist parties help to explain the discrepency

So the primary purporse of article is to discuss the applicability of one theory.

if you say "these people have cited (as a Y) (X)" -- or, equivalently, "these people have cited X as a Y" -- then it's not an objective fact that X is a Y; that's just what these people are saying.
on the other hand, if you say "these people have cited X, a Y", then that sentence carries the meaning that it is an objective fact that X is a Y.

不懂为什么E错，求老师同学解答。

It sounds to me that a vantage point performs the action that combines with her talent, and also, make should be made.

A的问题在哪里呢