A ‘for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight’原因状语 not make sense 应该是时间状语比较reasonable
B 'When Charles Lindbergh was attempting his solo transatlantic flight,' &'being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane'两个独立的状语 分开修饰主句 语义上后者应该 作时间状语 修饰前者
C since... so 明显wordy
比较好奇 D 错在哪儿 还有E 伴随可以省略being???
E ’Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane...'前面不用加being 咩
MARK.
A 主语从句 语法上没有错误 在语义上 发现这件事应该已经完成了 所以需要noun 跟make sense
umm, 'keep them cool' kinda tricky
在C和D的条件外都可以再补充,cable car还是可能会对环境带来危害。但是E说的是cable car的存在改变了过去对环境造成伤害的局面,calls into question that " cable car is certain to result in harm to the ruins"
感觉E ’has plummeted‘ last yr 也有点问题?
对A取非,如果消耗大于生产,还是要进口
解释为何没有出现P数量的增加,类似于explain
与后面的the clearing of 并列,后面是名词clearing,前面也应该用名词removal而不是动名词removing
充分非必要
只说不用不是真科学,不意味用了就是真科学
若果没有that,they will gesture...与前面连接,同在when speaking 下,但明显不是speaking下的事情
A ’economy's continued strength‘ okay with that
B/C/E 'for wks' 现在完成时标志 B/D lack of the word 'will' C 'would' incorrect
In the second sentence:
The state relaxes the restrictions (1)
Costs will go down (3)
What is missing in the logic of the second sentence, then, is (2) - why will the costs go down?
According to our opening sentence, fees are lower when more services are advertised (2). This is what (C) says.
Let's make this passage into a semblance of logic:
Fewer restrictions on advertising = 1
More lawyers advertise = 2
Lawyers who advertise charge less than those who do not = 3
The first sentence of the passage now reads:
If 1,
then 2,
then 3.
A making 伴随状语 逻辑主语 incorrect
B that定语从句没有verb ( ...hold V+ed修饰)
C A law (passed in 1933)[that made it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen holding...]同位语
语法发上正确 意思上不make sense
D because of + a law ...making 语义上emphasize 法律让带金子的公民行为犯法这件事而不是a law 本身
E being同时性 跟C一样emphasize ‘a law'本身
MARK.
C news是单数 要用was
C & E 在意思上也有slight difference (定语修饰 v.s. 状语)
感觉BDE很好排除,为什么A不对呢 ,我选的是A。那些女性是皇族受过良好教育,所以有先进的女权主义思想啊。并不是因为君主制导致个人意识的觉醒。感觉也可以削弱呢。求解答
CG通过举Cavendish的例子来论述absolute monarchy概念的存在导致absolute self概念的出现 但C项里说Cavendish的观点是直接来自她自己 削弱CG论述里absolute monarchy的前提?
我觉得是要削弱这个原因,而不是给出一个新的原因
题目到底问的是削弱CG的结论还是削弱CG提供的原因,如果是削弱原因应该是E他因啊,如果不是那就是C,我纠结了很久,仔细看题目意思不是削弱原因吗?
问: sizable minority faction这里怎么理解?
相当小的一部分
相当大的一个少数派吧。。。不管怎么理解对本题似乎影响都不大
C选项是emergency treatment,对应题目