E选项混合了两个观点，而the passage states that baboons eat only soft-bodied insects

错选D，第二段确实说diet may have varied from one region to another, but the passage say nothing about walker's research from which to infer that it indicated such variation

temporaily=short term

A 'a work that, taking him seven years until completion' 定语从句 lack of verb
B work that 引导的定语从句必须充当成分
C/D/E pronounce身后有it，则先行词无法在句中充当成分
D/E 'translating the lliad' 翻译应该已经完成了 noun比ing更合适

C选项是emergency treatment，对应题目

A ‘for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight’原因状语 not make sense 应该是时间状语比较reasonable
B 'When Charles Lindbergh was attempting his solo transatlantic flight,' &'being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane'两个独立的状语 分开修饰主句 语义上后者应该 作时间状语 修饰前者
C since... so 明显wordy
比较好奇 D 错在哪儿 还有E 伴随可以省略being???

E ’Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane...'前面不用加being 咩

MARK.
A 主语从句 语法上没有错误 在语义上 发现这件事应该已经完成了 所以需要noun 跟make sense

umm, 'keep them cool' kinda tricky

在C和D的条件外都可以再补充，cable car还是可能会对环境带来危害。但是E说的是cable car的存在改变了过去对环境造成伤害的局面，calls into question that " cable car is certain to result in harm to the ruins"

感觉E ’has plummeted‘ last yr 也有点问题？

对A取非，如果消耗大于生产，还是要进口

解释为何没有出现P数量的增加，类似于explain

与后面的the clearing of 并列，后面是名词clearing，前面也应该用名词removal而不是动名词removing

充分非必要

只说不用不是真科学，不意味用了就是真科学

若果没有that，they will gesture...与前面连接，同在when speaking 下，但明显不是speaking下的事情

A ’economy's continued strength‘ okay with that
B/C/E 'for wks' 现在完成时标志 B/D lack of the word 'will' C 'would' incorrect

In the second sentence:

The state relaxes the restrictions (1)
Costs will go down (3)

What is missing in the logic of the second sentence, then, is (2) - why will the costs go down?

According to our opening sentence, fees are lower when more services are advertised (2). This is what (C) says.

Let's make this passage into a semblance of logic:
Fewer restrictions on advertising = 1
More lawyers advertise = 2
Lawyers who advertise charge less than those who do not = 3

The first sentence of the passage now reads:
If 1,
then 2,
then 3.