MARK. 根据原句语意可以排除 unparallel B/C
D but连接的独立句子没有verb
E which modifier
错选a,不是contain more cc, 而是更多地o18
... , had them decorated 没见过这样的结构呀
have sb done 让sb被。。。
哇,tend to。。。。
感觉定语从句表示属性,状语从句修饰动作。也不应该用独立主格吧在这道题里?
Yes, it is. It is used in making a "more than" type of comparison where you also want to refer to a previously stated verb / action (that's where the "so" comes in). In this case, the "so" refers to "reported high marital satisfaction."
Notice here that you are comparing two groups of women: those who take new jobs, and those who retire completely. When making a comparison, you have to make sure you explicitly mention both groups.
You are right that \"will\" is unnecessary in E. But I would give a slightly different explanation: You could either say \"... make it any more likely that a plant will become ...\" or \"... make a plant any more likely to become...\" You CANNOT combine them to get \"...make a plant any more likely that it will become ...\" That is, if you use \'plant\' as the object of \'make\
错选C。注意不定式和名词的区别
求解?
感觉转了两个弯,最后还是要支持数量至上
choice (b) attacks this connection -- if students are taking longer to graduate from college, then the increased enrollment doesn't necessarily mean that there will be any more graduates! it's just a symptom of the fact that students are staying in school for longer.
Ron大神回复:
the problem with this argument is that it takes the observation that "the number of Kravonians enrolled in college has been growing steadily", and takes that observation to mean that the number of graduates is going to increase in proportion.
BE纠结半天结果错了。。
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/in-addition-to-her-work-on-the-miocene-homicide-fossil-t499.html
Choice B assumes that people won't have enough money to go to the private schools. that's tricky
看懂了。。。
求讲解,为什么是a
我还是没有领会到作者的意思。作者想说的是尽管 short term price promotion has a lot disadvantage, 但是还是还是有很公司在用。整体是对price promotion 是持否定态度的。因此是E不是C
个人觉得因为c用了"justify"这个词,whcih is 辩解和辩护。c选项的意思感觉是因为对降价促销这个strategy有一些反对的声音,所以base on 这些反对的声音作者为降价促销提出这个strsategy进辩解和辩护。但是我觉得文章的目的并不是在于对为什么公司用降价的strategy进行辩护,因为第一段并不是在critisize降价只是在纯粹地阐述降价这个strategy对公司有什么影响, 然后第二段说明为什么公司想用降价的strategy,
我觉得c是错误的原因是因为c用到了“justify"这个词,which is 辩解和辩护。个人认为c的意思是说因为大家对降价促销这个strategy有反对(critism)的声音,所以base在这些critism上作者为这个strategy进行辩护。但是这个文章并不是为降价的strategy进行辩护,因为第一段并不是只在critisize这个strategy而是在单纯说明降价对公司的影响(例如文章第一段有写公司的管理人员认为降价会对公司有after effect, 但是研究发现其实降价不会对公司产生任何好的坏的after effct,这其实并不是critism只是单纯地陈述影响),然后第二段很明显就是在说公司做降价促销的motivator是什么,所以选e.
为什么不是类比推理呀