project 做了一个投资，这个事件，initiated on Columbus Day.

B选项的expensive in manufacturing 是正确的吗？

B选项的expensive in manufacturing 是正确的吗？

名词和从句的区别。单复数一致

转：题干先说每种蛾子都有一个最佳飞行体温。然后说，气温低于最佳飞行体温时，蛾子就会长期休眠，更可能被吃掉。结论说大蛾子（由于飞得快）不容易被捕食者吃掉。但是大蛾子需要一个更高的最佳飞行体温才能飞得快，题目问解释。所以正确答案一定是给出一个帮助大蛾子达到更高的最佳飞行体温的条件。

图形背景原则，mark

重点分析A和C选项。A使用what而C使用something，两者在语法上没错，但使用what强调的是某个特定的事，something没有强调某个特定的事；此外，A选项的the other使用错误，正确的结构应该是one ... the other ...。此外，the other 和 such as是不兼容的，正确的表达应该是of other infections such as ...

1. 本体考察的独立主格结构，动词的过去式表示被动语态，即如果谓语是overlaid，其完整的是was overlaid，因此banked便可表示被动语态，由此排除D/E；
2. C： bank的对象应该是its framework，因而使用them是错误的，而banked them with dirt更是错误的独立主格结构。排除C；
3. B：that of无指代对象，且画线部分后面是具体的高度值，因而画线部分应该是“达到...样的高度”，所以B选项错误，正确选项是A。

1. risk of doing sth., risk doing sth. 是固定搭配，由此排除A/D；
2. one chance in a million 是固定搭配，表示几率很小。由于修饰risk时，as little risk as one chance in a million 和 a risk as little as one chance in a million都是正确的表达方式。由此排除A；
3. C：that后面it引导的是定语从句，修饰的对象是risk。而从逻辑意义上看risk不应该cause cancer。排除C；
4. E：a million for it to cause 表达错误。排除E。

A中隐含了购买高质量煤炭比低质量煤炭成本更高的条件。这种算常识吗？

Moreover, since customers understand a restaurant's product and know what to anticipate in terms of service, they are empowered to question its quality. 这句话是在形容那些low price的饭店吗？如果是的话，怎么就从文中客户不相信low price 饭店变成这种customer know what to expect的饭店了呢？如果不是形容low price饭店，为什么用“since”而不是“if”？

P反驳是利用现在法官们的从业限制（并不是plan想要吸引的那批最优秀的人才）来预测未来这个限制是否会影响到这个plan的有效性
犯了两个错误：
1）一小部分的法官会无偿的去教书不等于那些最有效的人才（effect on the current menber不等于potential members of a group）
2）现在的事情不等于未来的事情（current不等于future）

as many=a number that is equal to another number
examples:
- They say the people of Los Angeles speak 12 languages and teach just as many in the schools.
- A great trip! We visited five countries in as many days.
the earlier part of this sentence already mentions the # of drive-ins in the u.s. in the 1950's, so it is not stated again. since it is not stated as part of an actual parallel construction, you don't need the second "as".

the use of both "declined" and "in comparison to" is redundant. if you have a word that actually makes a comparison (e.g., "declined"), then you don't also use "in comparison to" / "compared to" / etc.

zen me jie shi D

E
"1. ，including 和其他，doing是不同的，它不修饰整个句子，只修饰离它最近的词！
2.，including 修饰的词不能包含这个品类全部的东西，修饰的词只能包含部分"

i also find something a bit awkward about the use of "unable" to describe something that's not actually an inability of the subject.

here's what i mean:

this plant is unable to perform photosynthesis.
legitimate, because this actually describes an inability of the plant itself.

A.moderate consumption of alcohol, and particularly of red wine
B.with a moderate alcohol consumption, particularly red wine
C.moderate alcohol consumption, and particularly of red wine
这三个一对比很明显A胜出，两个 CONSUMPTION OF 并列
B是red wine做同位语，按理左边应该是alcohol而不是alcohol cosumption
C是 of red wine 显然and左边没有和其对应的成分

这个不是选c吗 slope=-4/3 ?

哇 我真的瓜皮 but后面的是news of 怎么能用were呢！！！