A 不对难道是因为不是foraging elephants 只有在特殊时候才有。
考场上一分半钟一般是想不通逻辑关系的,只看是否相关
这个clever用得好别扭,请教大家都是怎么快读get到文意的,我读起来真的好别扭,得反应半天……
第一段 The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960's and 1970's sought to go beyond the traditional focus of political historians on leaders and government institutions by examining directly the political practices of ordinary citizens.
The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960's and 1970's sought to go beyond the (traditional focus of political historians on leaders and government institutions) by examining directly the political practices of ordinary citizens.
B和C的区别在哪里?
这道题解释的有一些些不对的地方,在前提和结论那边,建议同学们看看别的网站的解释,讲的很清楚
A尽管没有那么好,但是题目的CONCLUSION是 in order to boost sales,E选项错在这个可能影响的是PROFIT
比较结构
Helr老师,我看OG上写的A说的是expected的主语不清,可是我在读句子的时候感觉主语是明确的,所以这个问题是OG有问题吗
判断为枚举推理。A选项CQ:样本代表性问题。
这个解释很清楚,有种豁然开朗的感觉。
E 选项“while predators pursuing it must leap over or go around them”的“go around them”的“them”指代什么?怎么翻译这句话?
找出intended meaning
The explanatin provided by those who picked C is incorrect. Past experience most of the time cannot be used to predict future event unless there is a direct corelation. In this case, the teaching positions are more than before is far from enough to say that the same pattern will repeat in the future. For example, can we say: It rains a lot last year. So it will rain a lot this year. No!
请问下justification这个词是不是就相当于defend,也就是说其实就意味着这个说话者是支持这个理论的。
为什么没有声音啊?