this is the problem. if "with ____" is modifying xxxxx, then it should be describing some aspect, or sub-component, of xxxxx.

here, "each" = each style of cooking.
we can't use "with each style of cooking..." to describe "styles of cooking".

his is the problem. if "with ____" is modifying xxxxx, then it should be describing some aspect, or sub-component, of xxxxx.

here, "each" = each style of cooking.
we can't use "with each style of cooking..." to describe "styles of cooking".

(1)Na/Nc=3/2, 能约掉

(2) n^2

weigh：重量只能用 less，much，不能用 lighter 来形容

Granted, Switzerland and the United States diverged in the degree to which the expansion of industry coincided with the degree of urbanization: only 29 percent of the Swiss population lived in cities of 10,000 or more inhabitants by 1920.

如果是having就是修饰they了，加个that修饰pollutants

drains: 耗费（n）
precipitate: 加速陷入，恶化

https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/industrialization-and-modtern-methods-of-insect-control-have-t460.html

伴随表自然因果，服了

(1) v(v-w)=0, v与w不相等，v等于0
(2) w=2, v可以为任意其他整数

(1) 3^10+m, 余数不确定
(2) 3^4n+3为1^7,3^11,3^15... 余数均为7

代进去谁知道被约掉了， 0=-b+b!

但是在看D，其实是无关选项：很多人减少长期存款的活动 并不能说明方案可行。
因为减少长期存款可能有很多原因，而其中有部分原因可能也是现在人们不能长期存款 (即方案无法达到目的) 的原因。
另外，只是知道十年前的情况，我们不能知道十年以来，以及现在的情况，无关选项

C理解错误。我翻译成：很多人在快到65岁时才存钱进去，因此不能达成目标，削弱

定位词：women's gender

C最主要的问题是，题目中没有告诉我们以前的商业模式是什么，因此我们不能排除以前也是discount department store的商业模式

直接忽略xy好尴尬 分别求不等式

等式联立后还是二元一次的方程，（x-0.75)*(y+100)=(x+1.5)*(y-100)，还是求不出来，我是不是miss了什么信息？

定位词：rejection
B和K的论点都被学者明显反驳了