还是定位第二段:"The constructivists gain acceptance by misrepresenting technological determinism: technological determinists are supposed tobelieve "
作者态度是负面的,A和C犹豫,错选C-质疑的是结论,不是动机,偷换概念
定位i第二段 ”The constructivists gain acceptance by misrepresenting technological determinism:.....is to view technology as existing outside society, capable of directly influencing skills and work organization.“ 选B
细节题:第一段结尾提出social constructivism.,所以定位到第二段第一句话 :
“The constructivists gain acceptance by misrepresenting technological determinism: XXXX , in other words, is to view technology as existing outside society, capable of directly influencing skills and work organization. 即A
错选B, 着实险恶,引用了文章中的观点,但是这个观点不是social constructivism的,是 Clark的观点
前提:“接触社会”和“智力水平”具有正相关关系
结论:接触社会导致了智力水平的保持
B:智力情况不乐观,人们可能会社交社会孤独;即智力情况良好,人们才会进行更多的社会交往。属于因果方向颠倒问题
细节题 --“Clark believes this possibility has been obscured by the recent sociological fashion, exemplified by Braverman's analysis, that emphasizes the way machinery reflects social choices. ” This position represents the new mainstream called social constructivism.
The constructivists gain acceptance by (misrepresenting) technological determinism。
选C,态度一致,disapprove 不同意 misplace 错位....
最后一句话:“Thus Clark helps answer the question:XXX ” 一大串-Help answer才是重点
不能一看到个问题就马上觉得是质疑,所以错选D
这都能错。。。。。
理解错题目的意思了。。
opinion on sth./about sth./ of sb. 但是本题opinion之后并不是介宾,修饰opinion——而是一个状语,说明是在什么地方的opinion。所以opinion in these areas是对的,而不是用opinion on these areas。
A和E犹豫选了E错
A-执行了法规的工厂有最低的发病率
B-即使暴露一点也会导致发病
E是个削弱项,保护难度太高削弱了controllable
为什么C不对啊,是因为a matter of concern吗
D选项的平行结构更完整
A 和 C 都有语义重复,future 和going forward redundant了。
OG里经常说 and also 很冗杂
我的解题方法是going forward是一个修饰成分,放在句尾所以可以修饰很多前面的名词matter或者concern,这样导致修饰关系的不明确,所以C不正确。而A,B最明显的错误在于both的用法
A, and also B, 是可以的; both A and also B 是冗杂的
纠结了好久,最后败给了grow做系动词后面可以接形容词
idiom—to usher.The literal use of this word is the action of the person called an "usher". Metaphorically, it is used about anything that brings something into existence. The basic idiom is:
I usher X in.
If I want to specify the region in which this X is introduced, I would say:
I usher X into A.
The "in . . . into" is redundant and wrong: choice (A) & (B) have this, and the "in . . . to" in (C) is far from ideal.
MARK. 客观事实要用一般现在时!BCD时态都不符合,A不平行,只能选E
MARK. 错选C. (1)客观事实要用一般现在时;(2)there be 句式毫无意义且显得句子awkward, 完全可以删除
这道题真的厉害,不理解宾补的翻译方法是做不出的
哎,这种“实质平行”感觉挺难的,一不小心就理解错语意就拜拜了
consumer borrowing增加,business loan就减少????? 这明明是无关联系,GMAC老头默认了这是常识?
举手。我记得老师说过答案中直接反驳原文的肯定是错的。那这篇文章中都说了“ Second, it is a more continuous record than that taken from rocks on land.”,答案 B 直接打脸说你说的不对,这也能算削弱?
这里否定又不是结论,只是该结论的支撑论据而已
CR中攻击事实是错的
RC中攻击事实是可以的
放射支持者的结论(也是潜台词):在这方面放射不比烹调坏,既然食物的烹饪可以被接受,那么放射就应该也可以被接受。
beside the point 是因为eaten raw.食物就两种吃法:raw 和 cooked 当raw的时候根本不会经过cooked这个步骤,从而把irradiation和cooked 作对比beside the point
当cooked 的时候,先irradation再cooked,从而造成VB损失是DOUBLE的。