错选E,本来想着seal的食物少了,seal就少了,orcas就会去吃otter。但是文中已经说 seal population declined dramatically in the 1980s.所以E选项不能说明问题。
A why not is True
因为人类侵犯是无关选项。提干是说有人认为Marine fish濒临灭绝,但是作者不同意,还类比了forest,最后解释了是科技导致捕鱼增加,都没有说到人类侵犯。
explain where comes PAH - bio
Devilish Question, if u don't target V49-51, just ignore this.
meteorite ALH84001, which had beendiscovered in Antarctica in 1984.
its PAH's might have resulted from terrestrial contamination.
In other word, it's likely that it (Meteorite) does not possess PAH before it landed on earth (Antarctica).
B is trap. They don't claim any specific process. They just weaken rather than estabilish their own idea.
D is trap.
Evaluate (Yes)
Propose Argument ( Life ) (Yes)
Origin of ALH84001 (NO!!!!!!)
"which scientists generally agree originated on Mars"
the explanation is for the fourth question rather than this
hard
C is trap. not evaluates the usefulness.
Very Hard Question. Ignore this if ur target is not V49-51.
This attractive force, analogous to the tension in the string, is proportional to the stars' combined mass, according to Newton's law of gravitation. By observing the time required for the stars to circle each other (the period) and measuring the distance between them, we can deduce the restraining force, and hence the masses.
A is trap. No mentioned.
D is trap. Animal is not the cause.
Hard Question.
Only A True. very weak description with "may".
Declines in reef communities are consistent with observations that nutrient input is increasing in direct proportion to growing human populations, thereby threatening reef communities sensitive to subtle changes in nutrient input to their waters.
Just "may"
A is a trap. It's true that the passage mentions while it accounts only very limited space.
神奇的省略
ew!核心词的问题
注意不定式和从句的使用
本段再講 Soft 自己推論容易記得。只有C正確
it's harder question, though.
Resentment and distrust often lead to counterargumentation and to boomerang effects where consumers come to believe conclusions diametrically opposed to conclusions endorsed in adverrising claims,
A trap 並不是有人打擊廣告商,而是對廣告商本身討厭。
It explains how a particular strategy avoids a drawback described earlier in the paragraph.
drawback為untrust..
如果是一个削弱题会非常好做。思路一定要用削弱的思路来看。
实验:A组的人有权利选题,B组没有。A组的人选了简单题,觉得这很公平。B组的人被迫做了难题,觉得不公平。
结论:人们对自己的道德要求比较低。
实验到结论,其实有两个Assumption是比较显而易见的:
1. 给自己做简单题,是不道德的。如果觉得这个行为道德的话,那这个人的道德水准就是低的。
2. 样本足够大,A组和B组的思想会同时在一个人身上表现。也就是说,人们总是倾向于认为自己可以让别人做难题,别人不能让自己做难题。
这种思考过程在考试的时候,明显是不够有效率。如果只思考削弱这个结果的话,那就是:样本不足,A组里的人就算被人安排了难题,也觉得公平。这个思路很容易找到正确选项。
用削弱的观点来看问题,再取非,感觉就好花时间