Ｃ為trap
inferential activity is likely to occur even if consumers perceive themselves to be more knowledgeable than the individuals presenting product claims
並沒有真的提到。

Hard Question.

Another risk is that some con-Summers may draw conclusions Other than the one intended ,even if inferential activity is likely there is no guarantee that consumers will follow the path provided by the advertiser.
四個其中一個，答案是第三個改寫。

they就近指代，不可以选择B

traditionally VS. this year=but

side with谓语，表示支持

这道题考的简直是平行的盛宴啊

在OG2017 verbal分册遇到一个正确句子 （No.273）： The computer company has announced that it will purchase the color-printing division of a rival company for $950 million as part of a deal that will make it the largest manufacturer in the office color-printing market.
这里as a part of a deal that will make it the largest manufacturer 可不可以说成as a part of deal to make it the largest manufacturer ?

这属于那一类啊？
是方案的可行性吗？

第三个选项为什么不对?

错选B就变成了more successful to meet……than（to meet）……，不make sense。应该是to meet……more successful than others

the conjunction for, meaning because, is the most appropriate choice for joining the two independent clauses

1-先看代词指代， they 知道Pacific错，排除BE；
2-C， 语法错误，and那里是另一个从句，不应该有and，同时就算加了and也不平行；
3-剩下A和D，D很诱惑，光看选项好像是个正确的不得了的定从，但实际第三个句子应该是although的后面个从句，应该有完整结构，排除D，A正确

disinclination in many people这个说法不好

被动语态后接不定式to do

United States 后面应该是有一个逗号的
主语和谓语被一个逗号分开应该是不可容忍的
上其他网站查了一下，确实是有逗号的

1.研究脑图的学者发现；
2.the basis for...

fashion
n. 时尚，时装; 时装领域，时尚界; 方式，方法;
vt. 制作，塑造; 使适应;

这个理由有点厉害

给跪
死也没想到最后是m买了那几家，这真是 。。。比看电视剧还刺激

(e) "what the effects" is ungrammatical.
also, in constructions of this sort, "what" is generally redundant / unnecessary; it's better merely to say "to investigate X" rather than to say "to investigate what X is" (or other such wordy construction).