topic,老观点,GC agreed but(-), attributed a silver lining(+)
however, EK & M claimed ... arguing ... economically determined(+), M asserted ...Black Death ...insignificant(-). prevailing ...until ... restoring the central role
been recently challenged. JS , GT suggesting ...rat population ...insufficiently(-). Moreover, T disputes ...trade-ship ...number of dead rats.
T ...faulty logic(-)...single-minded(-) . isolated studies(-) , unconvincing(-) , overlooks(-)
选项B,取反说明seals也会吃otters,为什么不属于给出他因削弱?另外一个衍生问题就是,加强题是否并不是所有情况下取非削弱的情况都试用?而假设取非削弱都试用?
同想问。。。难道是B不够直接???
因为premises已经给出了in the 1980s seals的数量急剧减少,所以就算seals吃otter或者与otter争食,都不会对otter的数量造成什么影响(因为seals数量本身已经很少了,所以造不成影响)。
错选B,和题目定位关键词无关。
注意arguing
推断题。
错选A,没读懂原文。
C选项,反义替换,正确。
当先行词是建议,命令,要求(如demand, wish, suggestion, resolution等)的时候,身后的从句用“(should)+动词原形”。
先找main conclusion:Such reasoning might well be overoptimistic
看到后面跟着since, BF2 得知BF2用来支持conclusion,排除BCE
再看BF1,BF1前面有一个SINCE,即代表他是来支持后面的conclusion(不是本文的mainconclusion):” the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. “ 则选A。
在AD中选的时候,看到BF1、2中间有However就知道方向相反了,直接选A
简单明了快速有效的方法。厉害!
mark
没说中间几天。。
this advance错误 因为前面并没有提到advance 不能用this指代
numbers是因为beavers有很多种,所以是复数?
同问啊。这里Number不应该单数才对吗
numbers表示可以被具体化的几个数。如果明确知道有多少数量,用numbers.语法和逻辑上都木有问题呀~
我也是把numbers都排除了
网上找到的解释: The singular number is non-idiomatic and does not capture the reality that at different points between the eighteenth century and now, different numbers have described the beaver population in western U.S."
其实这道题的问法跟which can explain the fact是一样的。
forest可以supply building material,但不能supply sources of building material,只能as sources of material。我是这么理解的……。而且如果for providing(这个for也很可疑)放在后面的话,用做药材这个用处也可以提供employment了,但并不make sense。
越做模考越觉得以前做的题目带来的影响太大了。。。已经提前体会鸡精反噬了@。@
这句话是什么意思呀( ⊙ o ⊙ )!
就是说这道题目我之前看过相似的老题目,就用老题目的思路去解答,但是...用老思路解答容易出危险,然后就错了
soga
我也是,不打算看鸡精了,没做过的反而能做对,类似的反而做不对
我也是, 题就看了第一行 ^_^
。。。OG有道题目很清楚的写了Only只修饰他后面跟的东西。。。记住这一句话就行了……
说的好
能把 og里这种话记住的人我非常佩服
Most large is followed by signs, while signs don't really lead to an earthquake. Only C is right.
Devilish Question (Only to do this if you target V49-51)
Harder Question.
A. No Mention.
B. Too much...
B is latter than the research.
Harder Question.
C is absolutely right but its main point is that it will portray it as an economic gain.
B does answer this question accurately.
错选C,看反了题目。
方案。
B:现在工厂已经接近最大产能(就算贬值刺激出口也不能生产出更多产品了)