bc:svo与svc的区别
但是愚蠢的我选择了B,也不知道是不是当时一道闪电击中了我的脑袋
还可以用发生的时间顺序排除
从前往后应该是:德国--搬到纽约--不那么厉害了
所以应该分别是had been in Germany, moved to New York 和 (being) less successful now
这道题确实很简单,但却是一个小而精的陷阱,特别是在时间压力下。我错在,candidates 和candidancies长得很像,并且先入为主的觉得后面的句子主干是人,自然觉得E的of结构是有问题的,直接就选了D。 引以为戒,引以为戒!!!
我也是
一模一样!!!
A 即使翻译成中文我也没看懂啊;能不能这么理解: being able to take college-level courses while in prison is likely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
BD 纠结;最后还是选错了
mark。类比推理
方案。
错选了D。
因果。
错选了B,无关选项。
方案。
错选了D,本选项是方案如何进一步提升效果,不能评估现在的方案。
正确E,other forms of advertising. 是有可比性的,不算无关选项。属于CQ1:方案的可行性问题。
讲真,不大懂题目讲了什么,但还算幸运,根据相关性,摸对了
果因推理判断正确,但是第二次还是做错了选了C。
注意C选项承认了结论,但是没有提及原因,也就是说并不能代表壁画没有就一定能削弱猫是用来抓老鼠帮忙保护粮食的。
D属于CQ2:因果联系问题
deal不是purchase的同位语,purchase只是deal的一部分,买和卖 共同构成deal
purchase 难道不是动词吗?
是动词,我意思是purchase(那句话)的同位语,句子的核心词就是谓语动词咯,省略的说
D This sentence is a little awkward (the article
a in a part is unnecessary) and says
something rather different; as a part of a deal
to make suggests that the deal itself includes
making the company the largest
manufacturer rather than its being the
outcome of the deal.
E Correct. The future tense is used throughout
and the sentence structure is clear.
A There is no antecedent for the relative
pronoun which.
B Like a relative pronoun, the appositive
phrase (a part . . .) must have a noun or noun
phrase as a clear antecedent; the verb makes
should be future tense.
C The appositive phrase requires a clear
antecedent; making does not indicate future
tense.
E The fact is wordy; the inverted construction
does not successfully convey the meaning of
the sentence.
A 主语和宾语都是从句,GMAC觉得不好
A Inverting the usual order results in an
ungrammatical construction in which the
main verb is both preceded and followed by
a subordinate clause.
A/B纠结很久,把A中colder and wetter than was usual in some regions当成插入语(同位语),认为后面which从句做weather的定语,所以选了A;B选项中slowing引导的伴随没有动词让它修饰啊。
动词was被修饰
谢谢