to study) is awkward and wordy.
D Not almost until is a nonsensical sequence of
modifi ers.
E Correct. Th e phrase not until almost 1900 is
properly placed, and the verb in the main
clause is in the simple past tense.

GG
A Th e
placement of the phrase until almost 1900 at the
beginning of the second clause is confusing. Does
it refer back to the fi rst verb or forward to the
next verb?
C Th e sequence of infi nitives (to begin

B Th is version of the sentence loses the
causal connection, failing to explain why
James Cook gave the mountains their
particular name.

CD纠结；因为我觉得Limit单复数无法作为强有力的排除依据；但比较差异时，我注意到了C没有similar to one another，而A有这个，本着忠于原文的大概率事件，还是选了D

这里的comparable怎么解释？

做一次错一次

我的理解是大家做这道题一定要注意两点：
1.annually和each year重复排除ABC
2.文章最后的if they simply provided，中代词they的指代，D中workers是复数，they就近指代workers，句意就变成了如果工人们能够提供，与事实不符；而E中worker是单数，很显然they不能指代她，所以they的指代往前找就是companies符合句意
所以选E

D 比较的是user 不是土地

错选了c，没看到题目的if implemented TAT

严重超时！

E 句说的是个啥子意思嘛

第一次作对，第二次做错（隔天做）

做题目超时了

考试的时候千万不要以goal of / goal to 这种固定搭配去排除题目，因为我也说不出用哪种好，现场也做不出解析里的哪种分析！所以尽力去找常考点，语义不合理的地方作为排除的理由；

事隔一天，螺旋爆炸再次错！

感官动词才能+宾语补足语

D 很具有迷惑性，可是这跟文中的推理一点关系都没

BC 纠结；选了B

严重超时+做错

D 我一开始读的时候觉得findings应该是个独立主格结构；
看了OG 解释后，觉得是个同位语，指代前面一句话
Findings refers back to the scientists’ observations