where = from which
since X consequently
because X as a result

comet cause such (senstation in no other historical sighting) as (sensation in its return in 1910)

E：什么时候可以用so as to 动词后主语与主句主语一致；本题中 “自己不能减少自己”
so that 身后从句主语既可以一致，也可以不一致（从句可以加主语）
C：被动语态的问题就是——主语变成了某人某事。通常行不通的，省略了“关系“

so that 做结果状语从句

ving不仅可以做状语，也可以做后置定语，不能生硬排除。

我的问题是：
能不能根据ving前有，区分做状语和后定？

注意gmat是考查语义的@！！
unlike to do 是一件事情，另一件事情的语义是inflation可以被控制，而不能是unlike

so ，以后做题关注下 并列前后的动词是否可以通用。

A：
a RATE can't be FAST.
* the rate can be high;
* the increase itself can be fast.
similarly,
a height can't be tall (a person can be tall, or a height can be greater than...)
a bank account can't be rich (a person can be rich, or a bank account can contain a large amount of money)
etc.

it's possible to have "as many" by itself—but only if there's an obvious reference to a numerical figure given elsewhere in the sentence.

e.g.,
last year, i read 100 books; i have not read as many (= 100) this year.

there's nothing like this in the sentence at hand.

进入状态啊 一个简单的平行都没有识别，只顾着看伴随了

Ron：
"to monitor" is the only one of the three beginnings that truly makes sense here.

choice B: "... as many, or 250..."
—> this is one of the worst choices i've seen in a while.
e.g.,
• "as many" is nonsense;
• "or" is nonsense;
• "or" connects non-parallel structures;
etc.

this is a tricky one.

if you were narrating in the present tense, you'd say the following: 'as of today, the bees have migrated as far north as southern texas.' therefore, since this sentence describes a situation in the past (it describes the situation 35 years after the release, which is before the present), you translate all present-tense verbs into the past tense. this turns 'have migrated' into 'had migrated'.

there is no explicit description of the 'second event' you're looking for in this problem, which is what makes it difficult. instead, the 'second
event' is the point on the timeline, 35 years after the release of the bees. because the sentence describes a trend whose relevance continues up to and through that point, a perfect tense is appropriate.

wrong answers:
*
choice b implies that the honeybees' descendants somehow released them
(perhaps a very bizarre case of karmic cycles, but absurd no matter
what).
* choice c: 'the 35 years since' implies that the present
is 35 years after the release date. not only does this conflict with
the meaning of the original, but it also renders the past perfect (from
the underlined part) inappropriate: you'd need present perfect in this
case. also, since the release is a point event, it would belong in the
simple past.
* choice d: in this sentence, the commas +
non-essential modifier ('..., when') seem to imply that the
descendants' migration took place simultaneously with the release of
the original honeybees. in addition, in this sentence, 'it' refers to
some unspecified event (it can't refer to the descendants' migration,
for the aforementioned reasons).
* choice e: all kinds of problems with this one. if you don't see what's wrong with it, reply and we will elaborate.

不能用equally…as…

she was less successful after she emigrated to New York than she had been (successful) in Germany.

如果是人创造无意识反应，BCE都是对的。
如果是情绪反应创造了无意识反应，A是对的。

dance teams represent their own chief at the court of another (chief)

That ( x is y) is indicated by sth.

C选项中suggesting that 是什么成分，修饰哪块？

还是没能理解为什么C不对

别看解释
indicate指明的应该是（这个ruined structure曾经是一个教堂），而不是指明了（ruined structure）

Halley's comet caused such a worldwide sensation in no other historical sighting as in its return of 1910–1911.