第一次做题的时候做错了,因为错误的判断 at least some 语气不够强。
其实在Assumption题目里,some 的语气才强。OG里面介绍的Assumption题做法是把选项否定掉,看选项是不是削弱项。
否定some,就是not some,就是all。而否定most,就是not most,就是some,反而语气更弱。
有的时候这一点也是要主意的。
总而言之,做Assumption的题目,一定要按照削弱的思路来做
有一个疑问,A选项如果按照some的否定是all的话,答案翻译为[那些认为自己选择简单任务是公平的行为的人认为 别人这么做是不公平的]如何削弱呢?有点绕不太清,望指正
1) Based on XXX, Subject + Verb. (修饰Subject). 修饰后面的主语
2) Subject + Verb + Object based on XXX. (修饰前面的object) 修饰前面的宾语
3) Noun is/was/are/were based on XXX.
方案推理, 答案必提及方案, 故(A)(D)(E)排除; (C) = CQ3:方案的否定性副作用
In these tropical regions, diurnal(daytime) visitors to columnar cactus flowers are ineffective pollinators because, by sunrise, the flowers' stigmas become unreceptive or the flowers close. Yet the flowers of the Sonoran Desert cacti have evolved to remain open after sunrise, allowing pollination by such diurnal visitors as bees and birds-答案e从yet后半句来
with the goal of
2,620,000 results on the web
with the goal to
639,000 results on the web
the goal of is more idiomatic
ultimately的位置比起goal to更好判断
我甚至认为goal to xxx没啥问题。。。
只能说其他选项错的更离谱了?
"Former" is exactly like "ex-", so maybe that will help you understand.
Let's say some male executive, Harold, was married to a woman named Sherry, but they've divorced. In this case, you can probably understand why this sentence is nonsense:
As Harold's ex-wife, Sherry entertained many of his clients in their country home.
Clearly it should say "As Harold's wife". (Unless these two were very weirdly close after their divorce.)
老师你好。e为何不对呢?原题的逻辑是:65岁以上的比24岁以下的出事故少,所以推出年纪大的比年纪小的开车更安全。但是如果30-40岁阶段的事故更低,那么结论就不成立啊。所以其他年纪也没有比65岁出事的多,才能得出这个结论吧。
E是一个无关选项。本文重点是在于24岁前的司机比65岁之后的司机事故率低,而这是由老司机经验多和安全习惯导致的。
将它取非,比如你说的,30-40岁的人的事故率比65岁之后的低,也没有推翻原文中,65岁以后的司机比24岁之前的司机安全率低,而这是有经验以及习惯导致,这个结论。
要紧紧关注原文所讨论的逻辑链,不知道这么说你明白吗^_^
感觉你说的也有道理嘛
我跟你的想法完全一样。。不过我觉得毛巾的解释对
A的翻译大家没问题吗?为什么是“不会....比XXXX少?” 我理解的就是65老司机每年开的路比24司机少,所以是削弱,所以我没选。。。
你理解65岁比24岁开的少是把A选项取反了,取反削弱的话,那A就是assumption。A是说假设了 65岁和24岁开的路程一样多。其实是排除了一个导致事故率不同的原因。这是我的理解。
主谓一致;时态平行
appreciative 欣赏的、表示赞赏的,干掉AB
E: the river resulted from : resulted from成了river的定语,错
C: the use would continue to be restricted contnue to do 中间可以中断,然后继续
D:restrictions continue 中间没有断过,持续的,与从句中的not increase相对应
A和B无成分差异,B 错在时态不应该用过去时,时间状语是over the last several months,应该用完成时
B和C,C 没有表明是避免谁被偷
A和E ,A里的in two letters 位置不好,变成了 eruption 的定语
game不能proclaim,所以B不对
A有伴随嫌疑,B直接用定语从句更好
B students are becoming more and more学生变得越来越成功
E students are being increasingly 学生们“是”增加地成功
这道题的问法是不是有些问题 - The passage suggests that companies that invoke the "80/20" principle in support of customer loyalty programs 【?】 which of the following - 这里是不是少了什么词?
因果推理, 找反驳结论(果)选项, (C) CQ2:因果联系问题