P2第一句给了明确的提示，To evaluate these claims 误选C，并不是主要探讨造成数量和种类下降的原因。

the phrase near-peak.
this means that the manufacturing sector can't increase output by very much at all (this is what 'peak output' means).
if the manufacturing sector can't meaningfully increase output, then it won't be able to produce a big increase in exports, because there won't be any extra stuff to export.

was said to have done A in 1932.
顺序：A 在1932年被完成，之后被说。

虽然P指出了...但是amber还是广泛被误解。也就是P没有误解amber（这是个例外）。

However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets.
这句话看了好久才理解。

这篇基本没看懂，但是定位应该在全文最后一句。剩下的选项都不靠边。

这一题考的比较隐晦，如果不认真读题，很容易出错。题目的一个题眼是initially。定位：As we had hypothesized, the blood tryptophan level and the concentrations of tryptophan and of serotonin in the brain increased after the meal.

C 选项在重复文中的PREMISE: According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. 并没有从另一个角度削弱 environmental regulations does not promote growth.

老师，请问道题不能理解为因果吗？因为其实原句是有结论的， the treatment is useful。
但是逻辑链应该是 the resistance of treated plants wears off as they mature --> the treatment is not useful. 所以应该削弱逻辑链就可以解释原结论。
只有C选项符合。

woc 把题目看成削弱了......OMG

平行结构理解没问题，有一个疑问是，如果有选项是forming.... and laying是不是会更好？感觉这里作宾语，谓语动词has been是弱约束

方案推理，因果推理都可以做

虽然第一段提及了现在的医疗研究员怎么做的，但是文章开头第一句Frazier and Mosteller assert that medical research could be improved by a move toward larger, simpler clinical trials of medical treatments.指明了是要propose sth.

C: 文中并没有这样说。 Currently, researchers collect far more background information on patients THAN is strictly REQUIRED for their trials—substantially more than hospitals collect—thereby escalating costs of data collection, storage, and analysis

D：文中并没有说女权的看法和Parliamentarian的完全相反......
选错是因为par和patri太像......
几次阅读错误都是选项没有看清......
有毒啊。

conflicts between Royalism and parliamentary.
association between Royalism and patriarchalism.
patriarchalism = radical absolute power.

So, parliamentary = not or less radical idea.

Royal feminists ---> criticize women subordination and advocate women political power but royalism ---> absolute male power. so historians are puzzled.

If feminists had been identified with parliamentary side(less absolute male power), not royal side, then historians would have been less puzzled.

虽然做对了但是觉得很奇怪。 这道题似乎根本不需要条件（1）或者（2）都能恒成立啊？由题目知y不为0，分情况：当 y>0时，z

感觉E也有点道理，有点排除他因的意思

C: To establish such a chronology it is necessary to determine the relative amounts of land ice that existed at various times in the Earth's past. A recent discovery makes such a determination possible.

请问【to produce a ton of steel】为什么不能理解成【need】的目的状语呢？因为修饰的是宾语【time】？
那么如果换成【To produce a ton of steel, workers need time】这句话，【to produce a ton of steel】就是目的状语了，对吗？