had been时态错，意思是已不再是method了，与原文意思矛盾

with不能修饰前句...

it无指代

and extended 破坏了修饰结构，无主语

我扫了一眼d以为说医生不劝说是以为这样做不合法。。。直接选了d

d选项不太理解

逻辑主语+比较结构，主语和主语的比较，object是书

重点是不要提高失业率这个因素，也要考虑进去，d就没有考虑。。。

to do作主语有一种模拟的感觉，ing作主语有一种正在做或者已经做过了的感觉

逻辑主语是作品；只剩下DE；E的后半句动词和主语接不上

代词vs指示代词，这里指代自己更好！

孤悬修饰语

首先排除 than at any time 因为这样就暗示比较了时间，但是now 和 at any time不平行；其次看句意是车的节能属性比较，而非车的数量的比较；they和those选those 指示代词，不是自己和自己比；

D: another huge problem with choice d is its total distortion of the sentence's original meaning.
- the original meaning is that hydrocarbons assist those flies that happen to taste them in species identification.
- choice d asserts that hydrocarbons somehow help flies to taste hydrocarbons (other ones?) with the intention** of species identification, which is a whole different ballgame.

D: 'those of others' is problematic; it should just be 'others' (it's clear that the intention is to refer to other species, not to something of other species).

错，选了B，为什么restorers不能缺失？不能说成，修复者说，如果蒙娜丽莎表面那层没颜色的涂层能被允许拿掉的话，xxxxxx，语境没有任何体现非得是修复者拿掉吧？

为什么不是最后一个选项？， now with 不能做从句？ 是因为从句里有了主谓了么

E选项中that of the men和B选项中men's不是都可以做women's absenteeism的平行吗？

选了c求讲解。。。

正着想不通就从选项反着想