b是最优答案，平行结构that从句，its business可以improve，profits只能rise

考点：平行结构。B选项的第一个AS后面跟的是形容词，第二个as后面跟的一个句子，感觉有点不不行。选了E, 这个选项简化一下就是as distrubing +介词组 as compelling +介词组，完美平行。然而确实错误的。

PREP模考中此题正确答案为D。

四个数分别等于0或者1，把分母转换成一样的后得出等式，1、2选项都只有一种特定情况成立。

为什么要用with

1为什么错？

1\seems
2\more to inflame ...than to settle

E：although the proportions of accidents is small, SA may still have a greater accident rate than AD. thus his conclusion still holds, AD is safer。所以E 并不能削弱该选项。

这个题目是不是有误？第一个黑体明显和第二个黑体的关系是对立的，不是支持的，C说不通啊？

在A，B里面举棋不定，显示答案的时候，我吐了一口老血...

the original reasoning behind the tall tables -- i.e., the flawed reasoning described in the passage, which doesn't account for the "paparazzi factor -- is that the diners won't stay as long.
in other words, the original thinking is that people will order normal food but leave faster if they sit at the tall tables.

on the other hand, if people want the tall tables so that they can gawk at celebrities, they're likely to stay longer ... to gawk at celebrities.

Cycle : Tax Evasion -> Taxes are raised -> Burden on nonevading tax payers -> more taxpayers evade taxes.
How can we break this cycle. Either by ensuring that there is absolutely no Tax Evasion by tax payers, or some way for lawmakers to not raise taxes at all despite evasion.

the meaning about both common and less common: "renaissance" implies that the level has gone up; "modest" implies that it hasn't gone all the way back up to previous levels.

用因果推理做对了，楼下的怎么又跟我不一样- -

做逻辑题最怕自己脑补。。。
当时做的时候想，这查出来有问题的都是反对党，不是质疑了第三方报告的正确性吗。。。选不出答案。。。
看了答案以后发现，原来反对党是真的差呀。。。

看来看去他就是个演绎推理，我不知道有同学说是因果推理是怎么看出来的- -

可是there be 不是表示“自然存在的东西”吗？那发现这个自然存在的黑洞好像没什么不对吧？求老师回答！

独立主格

either or \ and \ but

这题答案有错，选D已更正