The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption that...
上述论点容易受到反驳，反驳的理由是该论点基于一个有问题的假设...
大概翻译，见笑了...

答案好像是C

马克

1-代词指代句中符合逻辑的名词the company， their错误，排除ABD；
2-D和E均是独立主格结构，跟oversea之间没有直接语意的关系，作状语，排除D和E
选C

和lyn想法一样

D和E的排除方法： 根据句子意思，and前后链接的是两个句子，D省略了谓语，那么原则上他的谓语跟and 前面那个句子是一致的，即has been dated to，这样的看恢复它的省略成分，这个句子有问题了，因此排除D，留下E；

1-根据句意，说的是the rate is believed，需要主谓一致，排除AB；
2-D选项非完整句子，严重语法错误，排除D；
3-C和E中，查看和题干中之后的句子链接起来是否正确；as seen是一个状语从句，根据定语从句和状语从句这些修饰成分服从就近修饰原则，到前一个句子去找as seen去修饰的成分；C中as seen修饰主句 the rate is believed；E中as seen 修饰which trees grow；根据句意，E的修饰更合理，因此排除C；
4-选E

1-比较结构是成对儿出现的，less +than，没有less ...compared这种说法，因此i排除ABC；
2-E和后面的题干分别是两个独立的句子，之间需要连词，nevertheless是副词，不能够链接两个句子，错误１；另外E中比较的是在不同的地点，其实发生的时间上也有比较，未体现出来，错误２；排除E；
综上，选C

所以like在GMAT中能否用于举例呢？

为什么through后面可以接improved?不是应该接improving吗？

这一题答案有错，应该是C

A：海床生物受灾的原因应是“食物供给的变坏”，而不是“食物供给”。试想，只有供给变坏，才能导致受灾，而食物供给本身是中性的，不会导致生物受灾。
【划重点】

...but its meaning clashes fundamentally with the usage of comma + __ing.
if something results from 'X', then 'X' happens FIRST.
in the structure 'sentence + , + __ing...', the modifier NEVER describes something that happens before the main sentence.【续】

A: if you see comma + 'resulting from', you can eliminate it.

you can have it as an adjective modifier, without a comma - as in the following sentence:
the flooding resulting from the abnormally strong storms had left six inches of standing water in the street.
note that the boldface is an adjective modifier, modifying 'flooding'.

一道被平行伪装的逻辑论元题...

B/C: the modifier difference required a meaning difference in the main body of the sentence. Choice (B) reads "creatures..were suffering because food supplies were dwindling," a logical statement, and close to the meaning in the original sentence. Choice (C) reads "creatures..were suffering because of food supplies." Choice (C) is less logical--the creatures were suffering because they had food supplies? or because there was something wrong with the food supplies they had?

D选项是说运动员的肌肉重吸收氧气的量是固定的，从常识来讲都不可能对啊，每个人体内的乳酸含量都不是一定的啊，多走几步路乳酸就增加了，重吸收的氧含量就高了，在家睡着肌肉没乳酸重吸收氧肯定少，选项里可给出明确的时间限制啊

E选项的主谓是否有问题，可否用found...as...排除？

E：amount应改为amounts。由于主语people是复数，很多人不能需要同一个足够的睡眠量。

老师，我觉得B选项it逻辑上指代study没问题吧，真正问题是it前面缺少连词，run-on？