D:The second gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish. - the explanation that the argument would establish would be the conclusion endorsed by the argument. The second statement is a premise, not a conclusion endorsed by the argument. 【续】
D:The first describes the circumstance that the argument as a whole seeks to explain - the entire argument is explaining a circumstance. The first bold statement itself is not doing it. It only explains why people are relieved - the conclusion which the argument questions.
as much water as
当不定式做主语,更多是一种建议,所谓的一种trend或者是趋势
如果存款人更selective-----那么银行就要保证secure-----才能compete来存款人的money
但是缺少一个前提,就是存款人能否辨别出哪家银行secure哪家不secure吗?如果他们连这个都不能分辨,看不出来哪家更secure,也就无所谓selective,无所谓银行要保证secure了,反正你也看不出来。
所以选项的意思是:潜在的存款人能够“确定”哪个银行更安全,不容易破产。提供了这个前提。
C没有谓语动词
each of the photographs
research在本选项中是及物动词这解释没明白
代词/单复数
代词they只能指代名词或名词短语,而本选项其逻辑上的指代对象people在所有格中,其已经变成了newly acquired skills的定语,不再是名词性成分(是形容词性成分了),因此they的指代有误。
amount应改为amounts。由于主语people是复数,很多人不能需要同一个足够的睡眠量。
C里面是population和amount比较
连词/定从
C选项中的rate they burn energy 感觉也有问题?
A市场占有率下降不等于销量下降
E则说明了就算整体的market走势是好的,在这种情况下销量都在下降,expand production就是没有意义的
能不能理解为BCD中的they本来应该指代是小鼠或者金丝雀,实际指代brain cells,所以排除?
请问c选项中的whose是修饰ants还是ants and cutters?
老师我对结论有一个不同看法,第一句话里说倒闭的those locations应该是G购物中心的折扣商店而非S,所以类比对象是C倒闭的店和G购物中心倒闭的店。这样A选项错误的原因就不是话题无关,而是未提及两个类比对象是吗?
这道题有偷换概念的嫌疑,P是说政治调和,C则是政府运转好。正确的选项指出2者不同即可。
10C3 - 6C3
请问E选项为什么不合理呀?中文念起来没毛病的感觉。
中文逻辑没毛病?。。。逻辑语义不通顺,且句子结构有些错乱,the pioneer journalist 应该是来修饰Nellie Bly这个人名的
Plan: Impose a fee at the time of salvage rather than at the time of sale.
Conclusion: Waste will be reduced more effectively.
A: Increasing the cost of disposing of an appliance properly increases the incentive to dispose it improperly.
Here, imposing a fee when an appliance is discarded will induce people to dispose of the appliance improperly, with the result that the appliance will NOT be salvaged.