第二段第三部分提到的政治的花言巧语也不是标准政治，因此A错

rising raising

give mouth sores to cattle, 给牛xx
displace grasses and other cattle food 取代草和其他食物
renderi land worthless 让land一文不值
排除DE 三者并列 ，and需在最后一个并列前
排除c 不平行
A让牛xx，伴随着取代其他食物和让land变得一文不值
B让牛xx并且取代了其他食物，伴随着land变得一文不值

显然 让牛xx和取代其他食物应该是并列关系 更通顺

这个题应该回到第一段去定位：Its basic premises are that humans are the spiritual center of the universe and that in them alone is the clue to nature, history, and ultimately the cosmos. 人是中心，人是通往xxx甚至宇宙的线索，【这就是在阐明human和cosmos的关系】，及题目问的“an organic relationship between the self and the cosmos”。往前面看一点就可以定位到【its basic premises】

road to truth点明了intuition的重要性，但很抽象还没有说明为什么重要【也就是题干的问题important because……？】，接下来一句It is by…… and by their interpretation of experience as, in essence, symbolic. 这句话刚好就是在解释为什么，their的指代对象就是intuition and imagination.

you can't use 'that' in this sort of construction, because constructions using 'that of' (or other preposition after 'that') must have EXACTLY parallel structures. in other words, if the second half says 'that during 10,000 years', then the preceding half must say 'the growth of ___ during something else' (or some other time preposition, such as before or after, in place of during).

there's nothing ungrammatical about 'from when', because the clause starting with 'when' is a perfectly legitimate noun clause (i.e., 'when agriculture began' serves as a noun. however:
- it's possible that the gmat does consider such constructions wrong; the only way to tell is to see if they say so in any official answer choices
- regardless of where the gmat stands on the issue, 'the beginning of agriculture' is unquestionably better than 'when agriculture began' (i.e., an actual noun is almost always superior to a circuitous noun clause, when possible)

legislative 立法的
问的是author of the passage disagrees with
虽然第二段说little could be seen in the way of legislative victories，女权学者们【用这个证据来证明】女权运动大不如以前了，这个证据本身并不是主要的观点
同时第三段反驳，作者也根本没有提到legislative方面的内容，而仅是对女权运动整体趋势做了说明，是上升不是下降
所以C项更好

several accusations包括：lack of inventive plots，occasionally inscrutable style，not a practitioner of the “art of fiction,”
refute one of these accusations是指：not a practitioner of the “art of fiction,”

结论：在群体测验中飞走是因为收到了其他苍蝇释放的信号
削弱：不是因为收到信号，而是单纯跟着同伙一快飞

B：制药公司都去研究有巨大市场价值的药，这样新药专利自然就少了，研究出来卖钱卖得多，利润高
D：Companies doing similar or duplicative research could indicate certain inefficiencies in research spending, which could help explain the research-spending trend and the trend regarding patents. 【Nevertheless, it still fails to explain the trend of increasing profits】

呵呵，自己脑补温度【升高】导致ozone hole形成，人家明明白白写着the ozone hole that forms over the South Pole every Antarctic spring as temperatures drop below – 78 ° C，温度【降低】到-78°以下的时候ozone hole形成。
问削弱→证明【今年ozone hole减小不能代表ozone layer修复，即不是常规的温度升高造成的】
D项 今年温度升高不是常规升高，而是异常的暖空气涌入

A: 不是conception是substitute 而是radio是；而且相较于C，A的it倾向于指代conception
B：but让主句和从句平行，这是不对的
D：which就近修饰错误
E：/

B. Correct. This suggests that increasing the percentage of solid waste that is recycled to 50 percent may result in a significant amount of recycled, reprocessed material of 【inferior quality】. If this material cannot match processed materials in quality and price, this may make recycling programs 【no longer profitable】.

记住：more dramatic evidence这样的比较用法是绝对错误的。

呃，不要把gold和good看混了

purport“声称”，presuppose"假定，预料，以……为前提"，equivocal”模棱两可的“
题干：
别人：不是基于文化背景
作者：就是基于ABCD（文化）
循环论证
A项 ：
The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
“这个argument以结论为前提，还声称说这个结论提供了证据” 意思就是说循环论证

气象学家说“只有模型够精准，天气预报才会精准”，【也就是说气象学家认为天气预报准不准与模型懂得精密度存在正比关系】。而作者认为这么说没有屁用，因为“每当天气预报不精准的时候，气象学家就可以责怪模型不够精准”，【这里作者的意思是他认为天气预报不准不一定是模型不准啊，也可能是你气象学家往模型里面代入的数据不准——也就是说作者认为天气预报准不准与模型精不精确没有关系】
问削弱作者的观点，也就削弱【天气预报准不准和模型精确度没有关系】
B项 明确说明两者有关系

结论：新科技测出来水里有微量有害物质，说明有害物质存在很多年了而且对健康没有影响。
D：多年前老机器也能检测出这种有害物质，但没发现会影响健康。
【一是肯定了“存在很多年了”这个推测，而是暗含多年前有害物质含量更高（老机器都能检测出来）对健康都没有影响，加强了“这个物质无害”的结论】

例子看不懂也没关系，只要记住例子是永远支撑主旨句的，然后用主旨句来选答案就可以了

原文They insist that mutations in a behavioral gene must alter a specific normal behavior and not merely make the organism ill。即必须同时满足2点：1）改变特定的正常行为。2）不至于导致器官病变。2个条件中的任意一个不满足就可以判断
如果对C的回答是yes，也就是说导致了器官病变，那就可以判断他不是behavioral gene了