the product of all the different

D：virtually虚拟地。即reporter虚构故事，但是原文只是说headline never appears in the story不是虚构

为什么感觉Hard part的文章比Medium part的要简单？

B和E主要是will和would区分吧，原句是过去式Britain cut...，时态对应

C. 文中并没有质疑的态度，反而是完善该criteria
B. 重点在解释该法律基础：是基于实践而非仅仅基于法律规定

C. 不是set land aside，而是reserve时候
E. explicitly：通过treaty。implicitly：根据Winters Doctrine

D. “Although this treaty did not mention water rights,“

这题好像蛮多争议啊.......
deep event和distant都有定位——
deep event——For a few events, however, the delay was long even at the epicenter.
distant——the interval between their arrivals increases in proportion to the distance from the earthquake focus, or rupture point.

着重在分析背后的原因，而非仅仅是illustrate

create a consciousness=change the prevailing attitude，
from the consciousness he built the revitalization=in order for his movement to find a foothold

The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the ratio 5 : 3, respectively. After Kaye gave Alberto 10 of her stamps, the ratio of the number Kaye had to the number Alberto had was 7 : 5. As a result of this gift, Kaye had how many more stamps than Alberto?
（K-10）-（A+10）=？ amazing

我可能就是个瞎子

一个观点中的不同，不是不同观点中的不同

B虽然也是差别，但是用海水灌溉，农作物应该会死得更快吧

我一直在第一段找，读烂了也没找出来
TQM shares with such systems the ultimate objective of increasing profitability，”such“肯定是前文出现过的，就是那两个

R觉得产生这种现象是因为失业率高，S给出解释，在正常失业率下，只要认识的人足够多，也会产生这种现象，不是因为失业率高

文中说的是use of chemical herbicides，不是decrease the use of herbicides

D只概括了第一段，E只概括了第二段(第一段是对顾客的印象的影响，第二段才是对service的影响)

defend 支持

1.pesuming(that), 表示假设某事发生，如果……，用法类似if，后面跟从句。同样用法的还包括providing (that)，provided (that)， assuming (that)
2.是those traces是否存在，而不是是否"能"存在，不需要用can