A.remainder of drug spending错误,应该是remainder of the increase
second only to仅次于
D. which定语从句不能修饰that
B.so...that
C.be able to主语一般是有意识的行为主体,故不用被动
D.not位置错误
E.enough to do
he sentence is stating a contrast: condition X is true for cod and haddock, but false for monkfish.
here's another example, similarly constructed:
[i]There is no snow in Los Angeles, as there is in more northern locations.
there be句型的平行要补出there be。
b比较 there be限制比较 鱼
unequaled ——无与伦比,不可比较的
Alternative explanation是寻求替代解释,即削弱。
Result:买套票的人出席更少。
问:除了成本以外的原因是什么。
A 是成本cost相关的原因,不能成为alternative explanation
BE无关选项
排除C 出席所有play的人可以得到refund(成本相关不能成为alternative explanation),同时是增强选项。
至于为什么D正确我也不知道
两个句子态度相同,排除BC
argument:今年的new jobs会比去年的少
第一句:现存的公司中 今年的比去年的少
第二句:因为新公司比去年少,所以新工作肯定比去年少
第一句、第二句都没有challenge论点,排除AE
第一句假设:因为缺少prey所以range widely
第二句:do range over larger areas&sort food is sparse.
两者态度相同排除C、D
排除A、E:第二句shown that是表述一个现象,排除states conclusion
exclusively 仅仅 而不是除了
A重复文章第一句话,这句话是general的结论。但这道题不是要求总结general的观点,而是要求解释why exercising the power to spend public resources involves the ultimate exercise of state authority
B翻译:只有直接代表citizen的government能够行使这项权力
convinced确信,后面肯定不会还跟虚拟了呀,直接用will
C错在哪里呀?做题时还考虑了一下between 1990 and 2000应该做定语修饰economy的呀,A的话就是状语了吧
没有可比对象。exceed that which had been, 但前面是growth,一个名词,而不是句子。把which had been去掉合适些
嗯嗯是的,前句没有出现过be,所以这里had been就不合适了,和上一题的考点是一样的
that which had been for 10,000 years表达的意思是,the growth of the global economy had been for 10,000 years。“近十年的全球经济的增长”和“持续了10,000年的全球经济的增长”做比较。但实际句子想表达的意思是,十年间经济的增长,比过去10,000年**期间**增长的还要多。全球经济也不可能持续涨10,000年,其中必然有衰退什么的。
第二次错!句子中没有出现be
would have to表示可能,没有have to那么肯定,这里ok的,也不是考点。区别就在economical意思
amount指代不可数,不能形容4000,D中the number 和 the amount都指代不清
as many在这里是固定词组,表示同样数量的,如:twice as many
news是不可数名词,谓语动词用单数。单复数用piece of来表示
主谓一致!!!what is much more difficult to determine,谓语动词还是用单数,不应该跟表语来定单复数
that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997指figure在1997这一年长到6小时,没有体现出增长过程
为啥D不可以 ,既然关掉也是可以照顾到员工的 这不是正好表明他们不关并不是真的为了为了社会福利么。削弱argument
根据句子结构和语义排除BCD。错选E:more than should modifier "fresh water",该句中紧跟修饰Siberia's Lake Baikal,排除。
【RON】when you have an INITIAL MODIFIER THAT'S NOT A CLAUSE (i.e., it doesn't have its own subject and verb), then it must modify the immediately following noun.
same problem in choice (e), which implies that lake baikal itself is somehow "more than all the North American Great Lakes combined".
that doesn't make sense.
关于A的两个modfiers:"more than all the North American Great Lakes combined" is actually a MODIFIER of "20% of the world's fresh water", which is WITHIN the first MODIFIER. therefore, it's a SUB-modifier, so to speak.
let me try to illustrate it graphically:
More than 300 rivers drain into Siberia's Lake Baikal(, which holds 20 percent of the world's fresh water(, more than all the North American Great Lakes combined)).
the blue modifier modifies stuff that's inside the orange modifier, so it falls within the orbit of the orange modifier; it MUST be removed if the orange modifier is removed (because it has nothing left to modify).
但是我认为,严格来说,应该是north american great lakes的总水量 和 20% of the world's fresh water做比较才对吧,A里面也没要表达得很清楚,这样看来A和E的差别也未必很大诶,虽说E可能更离谱一点