However, TQM cannot simply be grafted onto THESE SYSTEMS or onto certain other non-TQM management systems.
THESE SYSTEMS = rationalist + human relations, which are mentioned in the first paragraph.
1、 E introduces the word "possibly" which has a different meaning than "it can serve."
The "it can" means it is, really, while "possibly" means it might. Not the same thing. And the original sentence uses "can" so I want to preserve the meaning.
！！！！【 "in fact" contradicts "possibly".】！！！！
2、 In choice B, "which" describes "temperature", so you end up with a sentence that says the temperature is "an approximate thermometer".
First, that's not the intended meaning in context -- the crickets' chirping is the "approximate thermometer". Second, it's nonsense (the temperature doesn't measure itself).
3、the number of 对应it
"enough for xxx to happen" is a threshold. this is going to be some EXACT boundary at which something starts to happen.
paired with "quite possibly", this creates a contradiction. Eliminate A and C.
未划线部分as an endangered species可排除B（them）
如此严重以至于……
The long dash is used to indicate an example or an aside. Eliminate C,D and E.
Then, between A and B, only A follows parallelism. "Archaeologists have excavated a hull that is X and that represents Y." Only A does that correctly.
appoint sb. sth.
shattered//had done(NOT‘had been')
根据逻辑主语先排除BC，A中had been和shattered不平行，排除A
E中 WRONG---- sb. be appointed to be/as sth; WRONG-----either in the case of sb. or of sb's
"Being" can be used correctly, but it almost never is on the GMAT.
'MIGHT BE"和“Possibly”可互换
平行结构 ：hints of【 oil supply disruptions…or any unexpected growth】
D：The phrasing "save $ in X" is not ideal...
E：reads "companies could save $58B by preventing X...and gain $200B through Y" where the correct idiom "save $ by doing X" (i.e. to specify how money is saved) is used. Also, X and Y are parallel nouns (illness and performance) correctly completing the idioms "by preventing X (one thing) ...and through Y (some other thing)" "preventing" is a noun form ("gerund"), as can be seen from the fact that it's the object of a preposition (by). in fact, -ING forms by themselves are never verbs
反思：1.动词ing形式本身不做动词！！
2.main clause 的两个主要动作：…save…and…gain…… ，进一步…save$ by X (preventing illness)…and…gain $ through Y(improved performance).
first of all, you can use the correct idiom 'more likely to be found ... than ...' to eliminate choices c, d, e right away. you can't write 'more likely ... as opposed to ...' or 'more likely ... instead of ...'; both of those are unidiomatic, and therefore incorrect, 100% of the time.
look no further than the 'which' in choice a, which is followed by the verb 'exposes'. that verb is singular, indicating that 'which' must refer to something singular - and there are no singular nouns in that part of the sentence at all.
一般来说，两个as后的内容平行，所以是drivers will be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as likely to exceed the current one，但这里完整是drivers will be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are (likely to exceed the current one)，第一个as前面的driver will be 纳入了其中，第二个as后的are与前面的be as likely to exceed的will be对应。
正确表达Explanation for sth is (that)+完整的句子，如D选项后加there was的完整句子。
A选项简化为：Similarity can be explained as movement，即sth1 can be explained as sth2. sth1和sth2应该是同一事物，而题目中的sth1是similarity 与movement本身无对应关系。
扫描二维码，直接登录
showy, articulate,literate,stingy 這4個單字完全不知道什麼意思,然後看了Absurd,荒唐.問題問最沒什麼可能與brilliant"正,很棒"意思相關,只有Absurd是相反意思,於是我就選對了....