misunderstood 不准确， 没有完全推翻之前的观点，只是revise

这题目我还以为是个什么高级句式呢。。

that statistic would be what we would expect even if volunteering does not boost longevity: 即使志愿服务并不能延长寿命，这一统计数字也是我们所期望的

错选B，这个选项只是复述了原文
正确C。原文 新开+原来 提供的job，已知原来提供的jobs少了，+assumption（新开的提供jobs没有多）→结论：除非又新开了，jobs才会多（可理解为不变状态下，jobs少了）

做题未掌握好时间，重新看题目，AE削弱，B增强，C无关

题目目的：reduce maintenance time选项要和时间相关
原文结论的维修时间不光包括上漆时间，还包括下次维修的扯漆时间，肯定两个时间都短加强了维修时间段。
B选项，film这个方法扯漆时间短，加强了film这个方案用时短
（可以取非理解，如果film这个方法扯漆时间长，那么film这个方案用时不一定短，削弱原文方案）

错选A，A选项：压力管理以创造更多的更高技术和高薪的职位。这句话的依据在“promoting a more inclusive approach that sought for all members the right to participate in the internal affairs of unions, access to skilled and high-paying positions within the occupational hierarchy”这个选项属于过于片面，这个窘境是维持原状还是一视同仁，不只是更好的工作的问题。
D选项定位：Unions faced a choice between either maintaining the prewar status quo or promoting a more inclusive approach that sought for all members the right to participate in the internal affairs of unions, access to skilled and high-paying positions within the occupational hierarchy, and protection against management's arbitrary authority
a choice between either...or....=dilemma
choice d直接概括了promoting a more inclusive approach that...(1.让所有成员有权利参与工会内部事务讨论。2.争取更有技术含量工资更好的工作。3.抵抗公共场所的经理任意施加权力）

问正整数的range是多少？
1-7的range应该是6答案是B

想请问一下，原文说的是tuff机油在更低温情况下运行比其他竞争对手更好，为什么答案选择在过热的情况？
我的理解：因是低温更好，果是tuff能给更好的保护。 这里没说到过热的情况啊？

不能是B证明这个方案没有用吗？说明他们降价也没用

twice as many English majors as history majors= English major is twice as many as history major

疑问：
文章第一句话就是M的减少减少了鱼的数量。反过来就是增加M会增加鱼的数量。D属于复述给定信息呀，怎么会是D？
E，原文有提到种M可以让公司获得木材收入。不管鱼的收入增加还是木材收入增加都会增加公司的收入。但前提是把M砍了卖木材不会再次引起海岸侵蚀--鱼减少。E不是很正确么？

这里的its指代each？？？

AD之间很纠结，D的话，万一顾客不顺便买糕点和食物呢？

D 文章主旨不是在解釋現象，而是在表達立場

(E)去掉not變weaken

Thus, an alternative view has emerged in the economics literature,D选项：Correct. 讨论另一个观点的出现。同“考点”，文章都在围绕着这个“另一个观点”转。作者的目的是讨论这个观点。

E选项：为第二个观点与可能存在的“反对证据”做辩护。文中的第三段也只是提出第二个观点存在的不足（反对证据），并没有为了其做辩护的意思。

the percentage of assessed value that was paid as property taxes to the city did not change during this period——税率不变

If the statements above are true, then it is also "possible" that in Patton City

Pronoun error - The last item in the list says "and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than they had". "They" does not have an antecedent and is wrong. It is supposed to refer to pilots but pilot itself is not a subject, only "pilot errors". Eliminate A, C, and E.
In matters of list //islm, if you apply a tenet of //ism for one arm, then you must do that for all the rest too. Now in this case, you can not apply //ism of ‘Can be carefully planned’, to ‘weather conditions that cannot be foreseen’ alone. You must also parallelize other arms by saying some thing similar to “accidents that can not be prevented and pilot errors that can not be eliminated” etc” None of the choices does that. So parallelism is not the issue here.