老师：您好，请问E选项这边other than what it is是连接哪两个句子呢？

A，she shattered expectations more audaciously than.....had been,显然shattered 和had been应该是对应的
;应该是had done而不是had been

对于DE我的理解是，这句核心词是satellite 而不是 male planet，所以表述的是女人而不是男人或父权（absolute monarch)

错选了a。
a和e的区别在对第一句的解释。 第一句重点在后半句， 宇航员的想法。 所以不能当作一个circumstance（客观情况） 来讲。

　(D) prevention表达笨拙; improving不如improved意思表达准确

Which of the following would be the most logically effective rebuttal to Kayla’s objection （that） a proponent of the city’s plan could make？

零售商会乘着生产商打折的时候大量购买存货，之后却依然以正价卖给客户。导致客户并不能获利从而不会提升客户的购买量。相比之下，如果生产商不搞促销直接按原价销售，客户也是按原价购买的，购买量不变。生产商反而能赚更多钱。

However, since many financiers believe that deficits ordinarily create inflation, then admittedly they will be inclined to raise interest rates to offset mistakenly anticipated inflation. This effect, however, is due to ignorance, not to the deficit itself, and could be lessened by educating financiers on this issue.
第二种观点有一定道理，尽管原因并不是financiers认为的那样；financiers认为赤字会引发通货膨胀，所以他们想要调高利率去抵消错误造成的通货膨胀
引发利率上涨的原因是不正确的，不是他们认为的赤字，而是他们以为赤字会造成通货膨胀，他们自己擅自上调了利率造成的

"从句意看，研究应该是reveal一件事，而不是一个noun，排除DE

原因应该是温度增加，而不是增加的温度，排除AC"

原文说书少于50年，没有许可不能被copy。所以被copy的还没有许可的一定至少50年了。
Flaw：错误假设规则一定会被遵守
B：说坐车一定会买票，所以买票的人一定会坐车。这把遵守规则当做前提了，如果是坐车的一定买票了，则就是那个flaw了。
C：右转一定会打灯，所以没打灯的一定不是右转。有flaw，不一定右转的人都会打灯。
D：人合法过境一定要有护照，所以人没有护照不能过境，没有flaw
E：任何境内居住有收入的人都要纳税，(flaw就是不一定这样的人就会纳税，所以没有纳税的人不一定就是没收入的人）如果说没有纳税的人一定是没有收入的就可以选了

"主语是gravitational force，谓语动词用单数，排除AB
enough sth to do 排除E
只有 enough sth to do 没有 so much sth to do的说法 排除D

CD意思上的区别
C, the gravitational force causes contractions that may generate so much heat.引力产生收缩，收缩发热。
D, the gravitational force, causing contractions, may generate so much heat.引力发热，引力产生收缩。"

"错选A
A\B which指代conquest，其他国王不能重复 丹麦征服英国的这个历史事件。重复的只能是成就
C选项 an achievement that kings attempted to repeat but kings were not successful at it. it指代achievement。但是定语从句就是来修饰achievement的，不能在定语从句中再用代词指代achievement
I was reading a book that had just been printed and that no one else had read
--> correct. note that the whole modifier describes ""book"".

I was reading a book that had just been printed and that no one else had read it
--> incorrect. the ""it"" here is stranded, because the modifier is already trying to describe ""book"".

I was reading a book that had just been printed; no one else had read it
--> correct. now that the second part is an entirely different clause (separated by the semicolon), it's appropriate to use ""it"" to refer to the noun in the first clause.
D 尝试复制和没有成功之间应该是转折关系（but）而不是解释说明关系（that）。（并且，that was not successful的主语也不正确）

E 省略other Scandinavian kings attempted to repeat later without success."

D：all of any given pollutant that is to be controlled actually reaches the North Sea at present
根是否到达没有关系，有些污染并没有到达但依然是污染。现在没有到达不代表将来也不会到达

"height和high重复，排除CE
B and后面不是完整句子，排除
A spread是复数，说明树干和花冠都长在树顶上，不合逻辑

"

A ture的主语是statements而不是opponent
B 正确
D think of X as Y XY都是名词；think X is adj
E it没有指代
C think to be 不符合语言习惯

"未划线部分的意思是建筑师和石匠，后面同位语也必须是人，排除ABD

E 主语Architects and stonemasons和谓语动词were之间不能加逗号隔开，除非有插入语"

其实不太明白这道题，既然比较的就是牙齿破损率，结果原文却说两个样本完好无损，证明没有保存上得偏差。但起码应该牙齿破损了啊，不然这买比较得出结论“古代的食肉动物牙齿破损频率大于现代”

问个蠢问题，an expanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recently triggered a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth，句中that修饰的是large storm的定从，不用像which一样就近修饰吗，就近的话是magnetic field啊

逻辑关系，是因果，不是并列

n(n+1)（n+2）
n(n+1)